Valerie Guild

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 447 citations indexed

About

Valerie Guild is a scholar working on Oncology, Small Animals and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Valerie Guild has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 447 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Oncology, 1 paper in Small Animals and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Valerie Guild's work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). Valerie Guild is often cited by papers focused on Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). Valerie Guild collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Valerie Guild's co-authors include Susan M. Swetter, Arthur J. Sober, Shasa Hu, Hensin Tsao, Clara Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Allan C. Halpern, David E. Elder, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Oliver J. Wisco and Christopher K. Bichakjian and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

In The Last Decade

Valerie Guild

5 papers receiving 441 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma

2018 393 citations Susan M. Swetter, Hensin Tsao et al. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Valerie Guild United States	4	351	149	133	80	57	5	447
Waqas R. Shaikh United States	9	368 1.0×	100 0.7×	141 1.1×	150 1.9×	53 0.9×	11	455
Suraj Venna United States	13	251 0.7×	181 1.2×	130 1.0×	150 1.9×	53 0.9×	37	513
Suresh Thummala United States	11	262 0.7×	178 1.2×	112 0.8×	44 0.6×	33 0.6×	12	364
Lygia Accioly Tinoco United States	4	363 1.0×	165 1.1×	103 0.8×	51 0.6×	76 1.3×	4	385
Gregor Schäfer-Hesterberg Germany	9	367 1.0×	125 0.8×	168 1.3×	82 1.0×	42 0.7×	11	511
Susanna Rossari Italy	14	274 0.8×	121 0.8×	103 0.8×	155 1.9×	54 0.9×	31	445
Alison Burton United States	8	267 0.8×	102 0.7×	87 0.7×	47 0.6×	106 1.9×	15	332
B. Aika Shoo United States	6	210 0.6×	99 0.7×	54 0.4×	154 1.9×	37 0.6×	10	422
C. Soon Lee Australia	10	269 0.8×	261 1.8×	100 0.8×	50 0.6×	70 1.2×	10	506
Renato Marchiori Bakos Brazil	13	273 0.8×	96 0.6×	221 1.7×	237 3.0×	38 0.7×	44	521

Countries citing papers authored by Valerie Guild

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Valerie Guild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Valerie Guild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Valerie Guild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Valerie Guild

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Valerie Guild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Valerie Guild. The network helps show where Valerie Guild may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Valerie Guild

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Valerie Guild. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Valerie Guild based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Valerie Guild. Valerie Guild is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Rabinowits, Guilherme, Michael R. Migden, Todd Schlesinger, et al.. (2021). Evidence-Based Consensus Recommendations for the Evolving Treatment of Patients with High-Risk and Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(4). 100045–100045. 9 indexed citations

2.

Wood, Laura S., Brianna Hoffner, Krista M. Rubin, et al.. (2019). Managing immune-related adverse events (irAEs): A new educational resource for health care professionals (HCPs) and patients.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37(8_suppl). 75–75. 2 indexed citations

3.

Swetter, Susan M., Hensin Tsao, Christopher K. Bichakjian, et al.. (2018). Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 80(1). 208–250. 393 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Venook, Alan P., Maria E. Arcila, Al B. Benson, et al.. (2014). NCCN Working Group Report: Designing Clinical Trials in the Era of Multiple Biomarkers and Targeted Therapies. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 12(11). 1629–1649. 14 indexed citations

5.

Leong, Stanley P. L., Martín C. Mihm, Gëorge F. Murphy, et al.. (2012). Progression of cutaneous melanoma: implications for treatment. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. 29(7). 775–796. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact