Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Neutral Atmosphere of Venus as Studied with the Mariner V Radio Occultation Experiments
Countries citing papers authored by V. R. Eshleman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of V. R. Eshleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. R. Eshleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. R. Eshleman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. R. Eshleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. R. Eshleman. The network helps show where V. R. Eshleman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. R. Eshleman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. R. Eshleman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. R. Eshleman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with V. R. Eshleman. V. R. Eshleman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gurrola, E. M., V. R. Eshleman, G. L. Tyler, & E. A. Marouf. (1993). Simulations of a Radio Occultation Experiment for Measuring Pluto's Atmosphere: Lessons from Triton. 25.1 indexed citations
Gurrola, E. M., E. A. Marouf, V. R. Eshleman, & G. L. Tyler. (1991). Voyager Radio Occultation Observations of Triton's Neutral Atmosphere. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 23. 1207.3 indexed citations
6.
Ostro, S. J., D. B. Campbell, I. I. Shapiro, et al.. (1988). The Icy Galilean Satellites: New Radar Results. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 20. 876.1 indexed citations
7.
Hinson, D. P. & V. R. Eshleman. (1988). Evidence for Inertia-Gravity Waves in the Stratosphere of Uranus Derived from Voyager 2 Radio Occultation Data. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 20. 822.1 indexed citations
8.
Eshleman, V. R., et al.. (1988). A New Formalism for Predicting Microwave Absorption by Ammonia Based on Laboratory Measurements Under Varying Conditions. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 20. 867.1 indexed citations
9.
Lindal, G. F., J. R. Lyons, D. N. Sweetnam, et al.. (1986). The Atmosphere of Uranus: Results of the Voyager 2 Radio Occultation Measurements. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 18. 756.6 indexed citations
Lindal, G. F., Henry B. Hotz, D. N. Sweetnam, V. R. Eshleman, & G. L. Tyler. (1981). The Atmosphere of Titan: An Analysis of the Voyager 1 Radio Occultation Measurements.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 13. 700.5 indexed citations
12.
Eshleman, V. R., et al.. (1980). The Atmosphere of Jupiter: An Analysis of Voyager Radio Occultation Measurements.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 12. 683.6 indexed citations
Eshleman, V. R.. (1974). The Mariner Jupiter/Saturn ring occultation experiment. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 343. 155–166.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.