Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Phytoremediation of heavy metals: mechanisms, methods and enhancements
2018387 citationsMuthusaravanan Sivaramakrishnan, N. Sivarajasekar et al.Environmental Chemistry Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of V. Gayathri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Gayathri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Gayathri more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Gayathri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Gayathri. The network helps show where V. Gayathri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Gayathri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Gayathri.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Gayathri based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with V. Gayathri. V. Gayathri is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sivaramakrishnan, Muthusaravanan, N. Sivarajasekar, T. Paramasivan, et al.. (2018). Phytoremediation of heavy metals: mechanisms, methods and enhancements. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 16(4). 1339–1359.387 indexed citations breakdown →
Srivastava, Amit, et al.. (2016). Effect of Lime and Gypsum on Engineering Properties of Badarpur Fly Ash. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
Vigneswaran, C., et al.. (2015). Banana Fiber: Scope and value added product development. Journal of textile and apparel technology and management. 9(2).35 indexed citations
14.
Gayathri, V., et al.. (2014). The use of stabilized fly ash as a green material in pavement substructure: A review. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering. 4(3). 306–314.3 indexed citations
15.
Gayathri, V., et al.. (2014). The Use of Fly Ash and Lime Sludge as Partial Replacement of Cement in Mortar. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.20 indexed citations
16.
Gayathri, V., et al.. (2014). Strength Studies of Dadri Fly Ash Modified with Lime Sludge – A Composite Material. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
17.
Dutta, Rakesh Kumar, Vishwas Nandkishor Khatri, & V. Gayathri. (2012). Effect of Addition of Treated Coir Fibres on the Compression Behaviour of Clay. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering. 6(4).27 indexed citations
18.
Gayathri, V., et al.. (2011). Anti-diabetes activity of ethanol extract of Centella asiatica (L.) Urban (whole plant) in Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, isolation of an active fraction and toxicity evaluation of the extract. 1(3). 278–286.18 indexed citations
Ramesh, Manikandan, et al.. (1989). Pharmacological actions of fruit juice of Benincasa hispida.. Fitoterapia. 60(3). 241–247.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.