V. Deplano

564 total citations
20 papers, 436 citations indexed

About

V. Deplano is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, V. Deplano has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 436 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in V. Deplano's work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (6 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (6 papers) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (5 papers). V. Deplano is often cited by papers focused on Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (6 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (6 papers) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (5 papers). V. Deplano collaborates with scholars based in France and Tunisia. V. Deplano's co-authors include Olivier Boiron, Anderson Loundou, Yves Alimi, Mourad Boufi, Carine Guivier‐Curien, Éric Bertrand, Cécile Legallais, Vlad Gariboldi, Patrick Chabrand and Lucie Bailly and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, Journal of Vascular Surgery and Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

In The Last Decade

V. Deplano

19 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
V. Deplano France 10 228 170 169 116 60 20 436
Michael Neidlin Germany 14 216 0.9× 88 0.5× 158 0.9× 257 2.2× 35 0.6× 56 526
Daniel Bia Santana Uruguay 13 186 0.8× 131 0.8× 329 1.9× 145 1.3× 7 0.1× 15 507
G Kurland United States 6 102 0.4× 77 0.5× 167 1.0× 134 1.2× 134 2.2× 8 420
P.‐A. Dorsaz Switzerland 14 309 1.4× 204 1.2× 319 1.9× 78 0.7× 15 0.3× 35 613
Henry Y. Chen United States 9 206 0.9× 104 0.6× 96 0.6× 65 0.6× 13 0.2× 18 296
Jessica S. Coogan United States 7 413 1.8× 108 0.6× 365 2.2× 138 1.2× 43 0.7× 8 635
Reinhard Paul Germany 5 153 0.7× 99 0.6× 100 0.6× 297 2.6× 40 0.7× 7 436
Wolfgang Trubel Austria 9 336 1.5× 118 0.7× 156 0.9× 176 1.5× 55 0.9× 18 476
Neal R. Cholvin United States 6 241 1.1× 105 0.6× 201 1.2× 59 0.5× 31 0.5× 8 398
Daisuke Sakota Japan 12 124 0.5× 74 0.4× 41 0.2× 311 2.7× 9 0.1× 51 439

Countries citing papers authored by V. Deplano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Deplano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Deplano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Deplano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Deplano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Deplano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Deplano. The network helps show where V. Deplano may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Deplano

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Deplano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Deplano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. Deplano. V. Deplano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Guivier‐Curien, Carine, et al.. (2025). Geometric Aortic Remodeling and Stent-Graft Migration After TEVAR: Insights from Longitudinal 3D Analysis and Literature Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 15(8). 393–393.
2.
Gaudry, Marine, Alizée Porto, Arnaud Blanchard, et al.. (2021). A 10-Year Aortic Center Experience with Hybrid Repair of Chronic “Residual” Aortic Dissection After Type A Repair. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. 36(2). 285–294. 5 indexed citations
3.
Guivier‐Curien, Carine, et al.. (2020). Residual type B aortic dissection FSI modeling. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. 23(sup1). S153–S155. 6 indexed citations
4.
Deplano, V., Mourad Boufi, Vlad Gariboldi, et al.. (2019). Mechanical characterisation of human ascending aorta dissection. Journal of Biomechanics. 94. 138–146. 34 indexed citations
5.
Boiron, Olivier, et al.. (2018). Assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration-related properties using finite element models based on $$\uprho _H$$ ρ H -weighted MRI data. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 18(1). 17–28. 10 indexed citations
6.
Boufi, Mourad, Carine Guivier‐Curien, Anderson Loundou, et al.. (2017). Morphological Analysis of Healthy Aortic Arch. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 53(5). 663–670. 42 indexed citations
7.
Boiron, Olivier, et al.. (2017). Prediction of intervertebral disc mechanical response to axial load using isotropic and fiber reinforced FE models. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. 20(sup1). S39–S40. 4 indexed citations
8.
Boufi, Mourad, et al.. (2014). Examination of factors in type I endoleak development after thoracic endovascular repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 61(2). 317–323. 28 indexed citations
9.
Bailly, Lucie, et al.. (2014). In-plane mechanics of soft architectured fibre-reinforced silicone rubber membranes. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 40. 339–353. 16 indexed citations
10.
Bailly, Lucie, et al.. (2013). Comparison between the mechanical behaviour of the human healthy AA and commercial prostheses under various mechanical loadings. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. 16(sup1). 315–317. 1 indexed citations
11.
Deplano, V., et al.. (2013). 3D dynamic numerical simulations of intervertebral disc: bending and twisting. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. 16(sup1). 236–238. 1 indexed citations
12.
Bailly, Lucie, Christian Geindreau, Laurent Orgéas, & V. Deplano. (2012). Towards a biomimetism of abdominal healthy and aneurysmal arterial tissues. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 10. 151–165. 9 indexed citations
13.
Mokhtar, Omar Aït, et al.. (2011). Comparing invasive and oscillometric blood pressure measurements. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. 14(sup1). 149–151. 1 indexed citations
14.
Guivier‐Curien, Carine, et al.. (2009). Analysis of blood flow behaviour in custom stent grafts. Journal of Biomechanics. 42(11). 1754–1761. 5 indexed citations
15.
Deplano, V., et al.. (2009). Numerical and experimental study of blood flow through a patient-specific arteriovenous fistula used for hemodialysis. Medical Engineering & Physics. 32(2). 111–118. 40 indexed citations
16.
Boiron, Olivier, et al.. (2008). Nutrient distribution and metabolism in the intervertebral disc in the unloaded state: A parametric study. Journal of Biomechanics. 42(2). 100–108. 42 indexed citations
17.
Deplano, V., et al.. (2001). Numerical simulations of unsteady flows in a stenosed coronary bypass graft. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 39(4). 488–499. 27 indexed citations
18.
Deplano, V., et al.. (2000). Three-dimensional numerical simulations of flow through a stenosed coronary bypass. Journal of Biomechanics. 33(8). 1011–1022. 64 indexed citations
19.
Deplano, V., et al.. (1999). Experimental and numerical study of pulsatile flows through stenosis:. Journal of Biomechanics. 32(10). 1081–1090. 99 indexed citations
20.
Deplano, V., et al.. (1998). Wall shear stress analysis of pulsatile flows through stenosis. Journal of Biomechanics. 31. 19–19. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026