Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
GDXray: The Database of X-ray Images for Nondestructive Testing
This map shows the geographic impact of Uwe Zscherpel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uwe Zscherpel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uwe Zscherpel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uwe Zscherpel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uwe Zscherpel. The network helps show where Uwe Zscherpel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Uwe Zscherpel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Uwe Zscherpel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Uwe Zscherpel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Uwe Zscherpel. Uwe Zscherpel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ewert, Uwe, et al.. (2018). Visibility of Image Quality Indicators (IQI) by Human Observers in Digital Radiography in Dependence on Measured MTFs and Noise Power Spectra.2 indexed citations
9.
Ewert, Uwe, et al.. (2017). Influencing parameters on image quality using photon counting detectors for laminography.3 indexed citations
Ewert, Uwe, et al.. (2012). Image Quality in Digital Industrial Radiography. Materials Evaluation. 70(8).8 indexed citations
12.
Ewert, Uwe, et al.. (2012). Best Energy Selection for Different Applications with Digital Detector Arrays from 20 to 600 keV. Materials Evaluation. 70(8).1 indexed citations
13.
Ewert, Uwe, et al.. (2012). New Measurement Methods of Focal Spot Size and Shape of X-ray Tubes in Digital Radiological Applications in Comparison to Current Standards.4 indexed citations
14.
Osterloh, Kurt, et al.. (2011). Radiography and partial tomography of wood with thermal neutrons. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 651(1). 236–239.3 indexed citations
15.
Ewert, Uwe, et al.. (2009). New Compensation Principles for Enhanced Image Quality in Industrial Radiology with Digital Detector Arrays. Materials Evaluation. 68(2). 163–168.11 indexed citations
16.
Zscherpel, Uwe, et al.. (2007). The EN584 standard for the classification of industrial radiography films and its use in radiographic modelling. 347–352.2 indexed citations
17.
Perner, Petra & Uwe Zscherpel. (2002). . Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 15(2). 121–121.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.