Uwe Mayer

2.0k total citations
62 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Uwe Mayer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Uwe Mayer has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Social Psychology, 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 13 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Uwe Mayer's work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (22 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (13 papers). Uwe Mayer is often cited by papers focused on Primate Behavior and Ecology (22 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (13 papers). Uwe Mayer collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United States. Uwe Mayer's co-authors include Giorgio Vallortígara, Orsola Rosa‐Salva, Gieri Simonett, Hans‐Joachim Bischof, Shigeru Watanabe, Joachim Escher, Elena Lorenzi, Elisabetta Versace, Jasmine L. Loveland and Elisa Di Giorgio and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Uwe Mayer

57 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Uwe Mayer Italy 22 449 421 261 242 160 62 1.2k
Adrienne L. Fairhall United States 30 62 0.1× 2.4k 5.6× 88 0.3× 279 1.2× 47 0.3× 64 3.8k
Andreas V. M. Herz Germany 35 69 0.2× 2.4k 5.7× 122 0.5× 286 1.2× 18 0.1× 89 4.0k
Edmund M. Glaser United States 21 87 0.2× 783 1.9× 29 0.1× 41 0.2× 39 0.2× 36 1.8k
C. J. Darwin United Kingdom 30 230 0.5× 2.1k 4.9× 315 1.2× 153 0.6× 7 0.0× 69 3.1k
J. H. van Hateren Netherlands 31 108 0.2× 2.5k 5.9× 27 0.1× 491 2.0× 3 0.0× 63 4.0k
Keith P. Purpura United States 24 79 0.2× 2.5k 6.1× 72 0.3× 48 0.2× 7 0.0× 49 3.0k
Russell L. De Valois United States 38 1.2k 2.7× 6.7k 15.9× 21 0.1× 106 0.4× 5 0.0× 61 7.6k
Roland Baddeley United Kingdom 28 256 0.6× 738 1.8× 28 0.1× 602 2.5× 2 0.0× 59 2.1k
Horace Barlow United Kingdom 15 156 0.3× 2.0k 4.8× 22 0.1× 64 0.3× 3 0.0× 35 3.0k
Rob de Ruyter van Steveninck United States 8 30 0.1× 2.4k 5.7× 56 0.2× 94 0.4× 17 0.1× 11 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Uwe Mayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Uwe Mayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uwe Mayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uwe Mayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Uwe Mayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uwe Mayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uwe Mayer. The network helps show where Uwe Mayer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Uwe Mayer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Uwe Mayer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Uwe Mayer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Uwe Mayer. Uwe Mayer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rosa‐Salva, Orsola, et al.. (2024). Hierarchical processing of feature, egocentric and relational information for spatial orientation in domestic chicks. Journal of Experimental Biology. 227(5). 1 indexed citations
2.
Jacobs, Arne, et al.. (2024). Transcriptomic changes in the posterior pallium of male zebra finches associated with social niche conformance. BMC Genomics. 25(1). 694–694. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kobylkov, Dmitry, et al.. (2024). Responses in the left and right entopallium are differently affected by light stimulation in embryo. iScience. 27(3). 109268–109268. 3 indexed citations
4.
Mayer, Uwe, et al.. (2024). The Dorsal Part of the Anterior Tuberal Nucleus Responds to Auditory Stimulation in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). eNeuro. 11(7). ENEURO.0062–24.2024. 1 indexed citations
6.
Mayer, Uwe, et al.. (2022). Spatial cognition and the avian hippocampus: Research in domestic chicks. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 1005726–1005726. 9 indexed citations
7.
Mayer, Uwe, et al.. (2022). Activation of the Nucleus Taeniae of the Amygdala by Umami Taste in Domestic Chicks (Gallus gallus). Frontiers in Physiology. 13. 897931–897931. 6 indexed citations
8.
Mayer, Uwe, Orsola Rosa‐Salva, Jasmine L. Loveland, & Giorgio Vallortígara. (2019). Selective response of the nucleus taeniae of the amygdala to a naturalistic social stimulus in visually naive domestic chicks. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 9849–9849. 28 indexed citations
9.
Mayer, Uwe, et al.. (2017). Representation of environmental shape in the hippocampus of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Brain Structure and Function. 223(2). 941–953. 25 indexed citations
10.
Lorenzi, Elena, Uwe Mayer, Orsola Rosa‐Salva, & Giorgio Vallortígara. (2017). Dynamic features of animate motion activate septal and preoptic areas in visually naïve chicks (Gallus gallus). Neuroscience. 354. 54–68. 48 indexed citations
11.
Giorgio, Elisa Di, Jasmine L. Loveland, Uwe Mayer, et al.. (2016). Filial responses as predisposed and learned preferences: Early attachment in chicks and babies. Behavioural Brain Research. 325(Pt B). 90–104. 85 indexed citations
12.
Mayer, Uwe, Orsola Rosa‐Salva, & Giorgio Vallortígara. (2016). First exposure to an alive conspecific activates septal and amygdaloid nuclei in visually-naïve domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Behavioural Brain Research. 317. 71–81. 41 indexed citations
13.
Bischof, Hans‐Joachim, et al.. (2016). Multiple Visual Field Representations in the Visual Wulst of a Laterally Eyed Bird, the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata). PLoS ONE. 11(5). e0154927–e0154927. 15 indexed citations
14.
Mayer, Uwe, Shigeru Watanabe, & Hans‐Joachim Bischof. (2012). Spatial memory and the avian hippocampus: Research in zebra finches. Journal of Physiology-Paris. 107(1-2). 2–12. 39 indexed citations
15.
Watanabe, Shigeru, Uwe Mayer, & Hans‐Joachim Bischof. (2011). Visual Wulst analyses “where” and entopallium analyses “what” in the zebra finch visual system. Behavioural Brain Research. 222(1). 51–56. 40 indexed citations
16.
Kreutz-Delgado, Kenneth & Uwe Mayer. (2009). Generalized Statistical Methods for Mixed Exponential Families, Part I: Theoretical Foundations. Genomics. 23(1). 282–5. 1 indexed citations
17.
McDonough, John, Kenichi Kumatani, Tobias Gehrig, et al.. (2007). To separate speech: a system for recognizing simultaneous speech. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 66(7). 283–294. 19 indexed citations
18.
Mayer, Uwe & Gieri Simonett. (1999). Classical Solutions for Diffusion-Induced Grain-Boundary Motion. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 234(2). 660–674. 16 indexed citations
19.
Mayer, Uwe. (1993). One-sided Mullins-Sekerka Flow Does Not Preserve Convexity. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations
20.
Mayer, Uwe. (1987). Augenbefunde beim Aicardi-Syndrom. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 191(10). 304–306. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026