Ursula Greferath

3.8k citations
80 papers · 3.1k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Ursula Greferath

77 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Ursula Greferath
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Ophthalmology 648
  • Developmental Neuroscience 181
  • Neurology 278
  • Molecular Biology 1.9k
Replace Ning Tian with:
Ning Tian China
Saddek Mohand‐Saïd France
Dong Feng Chen United States
Alexis‐Pierre Bemelmans France
María Paz Villegas‐Pérez Spain
M. Kirsch Germany
Wallace B. Thoreson United States
Claude Gravel Canada
Valérie Forster France
Barbara J. McLaughlin United States
Ursula Greferath relative to Ning Tian China Ning Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ning Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Greferath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Greferath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Greferath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Greferath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Greferath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Greferath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Greferath. The network helps show where Ursula Greferath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ursula Greferath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ursula Greferath Line = papers co-authored together Ursula Greferath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990380
2 1995173
3 1991152
4 1995128
5 2016111
6 202197
7 199297
8 199391
9 199484
10 199383
11 202183
12 200073
13 200173
14 201472
15 201471
16 199470
17 202259
18 199558
19 200257
20 200257

About Ursula Greferath

Ursula Greferath is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 80 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (32 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (8 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Ophthalmology (648 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (181 citations), Neurology (278 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.9k citations). Ursula Greferath has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Heinz Wässle, Ulrike Grünert, Erica L. Fletcher, Kirstan A. Vessey, Andrew I. Jobling, Frank Müller, Mark Murphy, Robyn H. Guymer, Joanna A. Phipps and Jean‐Marc Fritschy. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Visual Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact