Ulrike Schöbinger

854 total citations
8 papers, 653 citations indexed

About

Ulrike Schöbinger is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ulrike Schöbinger has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 653 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Ulrike Schöbinger's work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (5 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers). Ulrike Schöbinger is often cited by papers focused on Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (5 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers). Ulrike Schöbinger collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Ulrike Schöbinger's co-authors include Martin Hülskamp, Arp Schnittger, Daniel Bouyer, Christina Weinl, York-Dieter Stierhof, Viktor Kirik, York‐Dieter Stierhof, Jean‐Marc Bonneville, Nicole Bechtold and Michel Herzog and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The EMBO Journal and The Plant Cell.

In The Last Decade

Ulrike Schöbinger

8 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ulrike Schöbinger Germany 8 587 501 97 21 17 8 653
Xianfeng Morgan Xu United States 13 517 0.9× 615 1.2× 96 1.0× 16 0.8× 17 1.0× 13 789
Esther M.N. Dohmann Germany 11 737 1.3× 683 1.4× 52 0.5× 23 1.1× 24 1.4× 12 886
Susan Gilmer Canada 7 392 0.7× 341 0.7× 92 0.9× 40 1.9× 13 0.8× 10 454
Katarzyna Retzer Austria 13 518 0.9× 462 0.9× 101 1.0× 13 0.6× 8 0.5× 25 642
Sumiko Adachi Japan 6 522 0.9× 504 1.0× 59 0.6× 37 1.8× 19 1.1× 7 638
Akie Shimotohno Japan 11 477 0.8× 406 0.8× 49 0.5× 17 0.8× 20 1.2× 13 568
Alexander Knoll Germany 14 443 0.8× 534 1.1× 67 0.7× 8 0.4× 36 2.1× 19 633
Sarah M. de Jager United Kingdom 6 640 1.1× 549 1.1× 69 0.7× 44 2.1× 11 0.6× 7 741
Phillip A. Conklin United States 9 529 0.9× 422 0.8× 29 0.3× 21 1.0× 34 2.0× 9 618
Freya De Winter Belgium 8 564 1.0× 485 1.0× 55 0.6× 10 0.5× 18 1.1× 11 646

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Schöbinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Schöbinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Schöbinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Schöbinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Schöbinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Schöbinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Schöbinger. The network helps show where Ulrike Schöbinger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrike Schöbinger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrike Schöbinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrike Schöbinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrike Schöbinger. Ulrike Schöbinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Emmerling, Christoph, et al.. (2010). Fragmentation of Cry1Ab protein from Bt-maize (MON810) through the gut of the earthworm species Lumbricus terrestris L.. European Journal of Soil Biology. 47(2). 160–164. 12 indexed citations
2.
Schnittger, Arp, et al.. (2005). Ectopic B-type cyclin expression induces mitotic cycles in endoreduplicating Arabidopsis trichomes (vol 12, pg 415, 2002). Current Biology. 15(10). 980–980. 8 indexed citations
3.
Schnittger, Arp, Ulrike Schöbinger, York‐Dieter Stierhof, & Martin Hülskamp. (2005). Ectopic B-Type Cyclin Expression Induces Mitotic Cycles in Endoreduplicating Arabidopsis Trichomes. Current Biology. 15(10). 980–980. 10 indexed citations
4.
Schnittger, Arp, Christina Weinl, Daniel Bouyer, Ulrike Schöbinger, & Martin Hülskamp. (2003). Misexpression of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ICK1/KRP1 in Single-Celled Arabidopsis Trichomes Reduces Endoreduplication and Cell Size and Induces Cell Death. The Plant Cell. 15(2). 303–315. 163 indexed citations
5.
Schnittger, Arp, Ulrike Schöbinger, Daniel Bouyer, et al.. (2002). Ectopic D-type cyclin expression induces not only DNA replication but also cell division in Arabidopsis trichomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99(9). 6410–6415. 115 indexed citations
6.
Folkers, Ulrike, Viktor Kirik, Ulrike Schöbinger, et al.. (2002). The cell morphogenesis gene ANGUSTIFOLIA encodes a CtBP/BARS-like protein and is involved in the control of the microtubule cytoskeleton. The EMBO Journal. 21(6). 1280–1288. 128 indexed citations
7.
Schnittger, Arp, Ulrike Schöbinger, York-Dieter Stierhof, & Martin Hülskamp. (2002). Ectopic B-Type Cyclin Expression Induces Mitotic Cycles in Endoreduplicating Arabidopsis Trichomes. Current Biology. 12(5). 415–420. 120 indexed citations
8.
Kirik, Viktor, Daniel Bouyer, Ulrike Schöbinger, et al.. (2001). CPR5 is involved in cell proliferation and cell death control and encodes a novel transmembrane protein. Current Biology. 11(23). 1891–1895. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026