Citations per year, relative to Ulrik Jørgensen Ulrik Jørgensen (= 1×)
peers
Raimo Lovio
Countries citing papers authored by Ulrik Jørgensen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrik Jørgensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrik Jørgensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrik Jørgensen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrik Jørgensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrik Jørgensen. The network helps show where Ulrik Jørgensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrik Jørgensen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrik Jørgensen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrik Jørgensen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrik Jørgensen. Ulrik Jørgensen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pineda, Andrés Felipe Valderrama & Ulrik Jørgensen. (2018). THE CHALLENGES OF TEACHING SUSTAINABLE SYSTEM DESIGN. Proceedings of the ... International Design Conference/Design .... 15. 2485–2494.3 indexed citations
Jørgensen, Ulrik & Andrés Felipe Valderrama Pineda. (2012). Entrepreneurship and response strategies to challenges in engineering and design education. International journal of engineering education. 28(2). 407–415.4 indexed citations
Jørgensen, Ulrik, et al.. (2011). Teaching contextual knowledge in engineering education – Theory of Engineering Science and the Core Curriculum at the Technical University of Denmark. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU).
Jørgensen, Ulrik, et al.. (2011). FOUNDATIONS FOR A NEW TYPE OF DESIGN-ENGINEERS. 275–286.2 indexed citations
11.
Jørgensen, Ulrik, et al.. (2010). Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to describe the functioning of traumatised refugees.. PubMed. 20(2). 57–75.15 indexed citations
12.
Grundahl, F., et al.. (2009). Composing the verses for SONG. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 158. 345.4 indexed citations
13.
Jørgensen, Michael Søgaard, et al.. (2007). Modes of environmental management in transnational product chains.3 indexed citations
14.
Jørgensen, Michael Søgaard, Maj Munch Andersen, Ulrik Jørgensen, et al.. (2006). Green Technology Foresight about Environmentally Friendly Products and Materials - Challegenges from Nanotechnology, Biotechnology and ICT.12 indexed citations
15.
Jørgensen, Ulrik, et al.. (2006). Waste prevention, waste policy and innovation.6 indexed citations
16.
Jørgensen, Ulrik, et al.. (2002). Restructuring the Power Arena in Denmark: Shaping Markets, Technologies and Environmental Priorities. 286–318.2 indexed citations
17.
Frandsen, Sten Tronæs, et al.. (2001). Recommendation for technical approval of offshore wind turbines.2 indexed citations
18.
Andersen, Mikael Skou & Ulrik Jørgensen. (1995). Evaluering af indsatsen for renere teknologi 1987-1992: Environmental Review 14/1997.1 indexed citations
Dalum, Bent, et al.. (1991). Porter og den erhvervspolitiske debat. 33–41.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.