U. Scheib

966 total citations
31 papers, 648 citations indexed

About

U. Scheib is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, U. Scheib has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 648 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 11 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in U. Scheib's work include Nuclear physics research studies (15 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers). U. Scheib is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (15 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers). U. Scheib collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Italy. U. Scheib's co-authors include A. Hofmann, F. Vogler, W. Eyrich, Michael Brands, Katrin Juenemann, Philipp M. Cromm, Lars Wortmann, Laura M. Luh, Peter Hegemann and H. Rebel and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

In The Last Decade

U. Scheib

31 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
U. Scheib Germany 14 336 180 147 102 70 31 648
Yuichiro Kida Japan 18 460 1.4× 101 0.6× 47 0.3× 375 3.7× 19 0.3× 72 1.0k
Shalini Agarwal India 11 110 0.3× 93 0.5× 10 0.1× 42 0.4× 45 0.6× 51 502
Mike Johnson United States 7 504 1.5× 134 0.7× 49 0.3× 33 0.3× 11 0.2× 8 917
Martin P. Horvath United States 17 795 2.4× 10 0.1× 44 0.3× 29 0.3× 63 0.9× 34 1.1k
S. YONEDA Japan 15 211 0.6× 22 0.1× 78 0.5× 89 0.9× 29 0.4× 70 720
R. J. Morse United States 10 321 1.0× 127 0.7× 11 0.1× 36 0.4× 69 1.0× 18 576
Stefan Jehle Germany 19 854 2.5× 186 1.0× 34 0.2× 33 0.3× 15 0.2× 26 1.3k
I. Török Hungary 15 340 1.0× 10 0.1× 38 0.3× 38 0.4× 149 2.1× 35 770
Todd H. Mize United Kingdom 16 470 1.4× 8 0.0× 50 0.3× 50 0.5× 21 0.3× 22 1.2k
S. König Germany 20 819 2.4× 118 0.7× 20 0.1× 280 2.7× 436 6.2× 59 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by U. Scheib

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Scheib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Scheib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Scheib more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Scheib

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Scheib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Scheib. The network helps show where U. Scheib may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Scheib

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Scheib. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Scheib based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Scheib. U. Scheib is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shanmugaratnam, S., et al.. (2021). Fine-tuning spermidine binding modes in the putrescine binding protein PotF. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 297(6). 101419–101419. 3 indexed citations
2.
Nagpal, Jatin, Shiqiang Gao, U. Scheib, et al.. (2021). Optogenetic tools for manipulation of cyclic nucleotides functionally coupled to cyclic nucleotide‐gated channels. British Journal of Pharmacology. 179(11). 2519–2537. 8 indexed citations
3.
Luh, Laura M., U. Scheib, Katrin Juenemann, et al.. (2020). Beute für das Proteasom: Gezielter Proteinabbau aus medizinalchemischer Perspektive. Angewandte Chemie. 132(36). 15576–15595. 6 indexed citations
4.
Luh, Laura M., U. Scheib, Katrin Juenemann, et al.. (2020). Prey for the Proteasome: Targeted Protein Degradation—A Medicinal Chemist's Perspective. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 59(36). 15448–15466. 133 indexed citations
5.
Scheib, U., Matthias Broser, Shang Fa Yang, et al.. (2018). Rhodopsin-cyclases for photocontrol of cGMP/cAMP and 2.3 Å structure of the adenylyl cyclase domain. Nature Communications. 9(1). 2046–2046. 54 indexed citations
6.
Penzkofer, А., U. Scheib, Katja Stehfest, & Peter Hegemann. (2017). Absorption and Emission Spectroscopic Investigation of Thermal Dynamics and Photo-Dynamics of the Rhodopsin Domain of the Rhodopsin-Guanylyl Cyclase from the Nematophagous Fungus Catenaria anguillulae. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18(10). 2099–2099. 4 indexed citations
7.
Richter, Florian, U. Scheib, Jonas Wietek, et al.. (2014). Upgrading a microplate reader for photobiology and all-optical experiments. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 14(2). 270–279. 27 indexed citations
8.
Urban, Joseph F., Yan Hu, Melanie M. Miller, et al.. (2013). Bacillus thuringiensis-derived Cry5B Has Potent Anthelmintic Activity against Ascaris suum. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 7(6). e2263–e2263. 42 indexed citations
9.
Scheib, U., et al.. (2013). Change in protein-ligand specificity through binding pocket grafting. Journal of Structural Biology. 185(2). 186–192. 17 indexed citations
10.
Scheib, U., et al.. (2012). Structure and Glycolipid Binding Properties of the Nematicidal Protein Cry5B. Biochemistry. 51(49). 9911–9921. 60 indexed citations
11.
Eyrich, W., et al.. (1985). Neutron decay of the isoscalar giant resonance region inZr90. Physical Review C. 32(2). 418–424. 17 indexed citations
12.
Eyrich, W., et al.. (1981). Neutron Decay of the Giant Quadrupole Resonance Region inPb208. Physical Review Letters. 47(24). 1702–1705. 27 indexed citations
13.
Schneider, S., W. Eyrich, A. Hofmann, U. Scheib, & F. Vogler. (1979). ReactionCd114(p,p) by use of polarized protons and proton-γangular correlations. Physical Review C. 20(1). 71–77. 2 indexed citations
14.
Rost, H., W. Eyrich, A. Hofmann, et al.. (1979). A study of the giant resonance region of 40Ca by inelastic scattering of 104 MeV α-particles. Physics Letters B. 88(1-2). 51–54. 20 indexed citations
15.
Schneider, S., W. Eyrich, A. Hofmann, U. Scheib, & F. Vogler. (1979). The influence of deformations of the optical potential on analyzing power and p1−γ angular correlation in the reaction 114Cd(p,p′). Physics Letters B. 80(3). 180–182. 2 indexed citations
16.
Eyrich, W., et al.. (1978). Evidence for detour transitions in internal bremsstrahlung of 90Y. Nuclear Physics A. 301(2). 205–212. 2 indexed citations
17.
Scheib, U., A. Hofmann, & F. Vogler. (1977). The (d, d1) vector analysing power of the reaction24Mg(d, d1) and the d1-γ angular correlation. Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento. 18(10). 301–305. 6 indexed citations
18.
Eyrich, W., A. Hofmann, U. Scheib, et al.. (1976). Alpha-gamma angular correlation measurements as a sensitive method determining the sign of the nuclear quadrupole deformation. Physics Letters B. 63(4). 406–408. 7 indexed citations
19.
Eyrich, W., A. Hofmann, U. Scheib, S. Schneider, & F. Vogler. (1976). Measurement and evaluation of particle-γ angular correlations for the study of nuclear reaction mechanisms. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 138(3). 543–550. 10 indexed citations
20.
Scheib, U., et al.. (1974). He− and Li− ions from a modified charge exchange source. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 115(2). 507–508. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026