U. Scheer

3.9k total citations
58 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

U. Scheer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, U. Scheer has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Genetics and 6 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in U. Scheer's work include RNA Research and Splicing (21 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (17 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (16 papers). U. Scheer is often cited by papers focused on RNA Research and Splicing (21 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (17 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (16 papers). U. Scheer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. U. Scheer's co-authors include Werner W. Franke, Kathleen M. Rose, Michael F. Trendelenburg, Georg Reimer, Georg Krohne, M C Dabauvalle, Eng M. Tan, Boris Hügle, E D Jarasch and Dieter Weisenberger and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

In The Last Decade

U. Scheer

58 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
U. Scheer Germany 33 2.6k 528 294 278 165 58 3.3k
F. Amalric France 36 4.0k 1.5× 743 1.4× 407 1.4× 197 0.7× 255 1.5× 53 4.5k
Herwig Ponstingl Germany 29 3.9k 1.5× 1.4k 2.6× 244 0.8× 223 0.8× 153 0.9× 64 4.5k
Ulrich Scheer Germany 39 3.8k 1.5× 571 1.1× 560 1.9× 502 1.8× 194 1.2× 82 4.5k
Elton Stubblefield United States 28 2.1k 0.8× 537 1.0× 581 2.0× 560 2.0× 96 0.6× 62 2.9k
Giuseppe Biamonti Italy 47 5.5k 2.2× 346 0.7× 445 1.5× 457 1.6× 263 1.6× 114 6.3k
Friedlinde A. Bautz Germany 21 1.2k 0.5× 267 0.5× 377 1.3× 120 0.4× 297 1.8× 35 2.0k
S Y Ng United States 22 2.9k 1.1× 424 0.8× 668 2.3× 109 0.4× 572 3.5× 34 4.0k
Peter Hausen Germany 34 3.1k 1.2× 735 1.4× 526 1.8× 244 0.9× 261 1.6× 73 3.9k
Shin‐ichi Aota Japan 20 2.8k 1.1× 498 0.9× 321 1.1× 385 1.4× 216 1.3× 23 3.5k
T.D. Pollard United States 29 1.7k 0.7× 1.6k 3.0× 154 0.5× 239 0.9× 195 1.2× 34 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by U. Scheer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Scheer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Scheer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Scheer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Scheer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Scheer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Scheer. The network helps show where U. Scheer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Scheer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Scheer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Scheer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Scheer. U. Scheer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mais, Christine, et al.. (1996). Localization of a high molecular weight form of DNA topoisomerase I in amphibian oocytes. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 40(1). 239–244. 2 indexed citations
2.
Weisenberger, Dieter, U. Scheer, & Ricardo Benavente. (1993). The DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin blocks postmitotic reformation of nucleoli in mammalian cells.. PubMed. 61(1). 189–92. 12 indexed citations
3.
Senécal, Jean‐Luc, et al.. (1993). Nup180, a novel nuclear pore complex protein localizing to the cytoplasmic ring and associated fibrils.. The Journal of Cell Biology. 123(6). 1345–1354. 37 indexed citations
4.
Weber, Thomas, E.D. Schmidt, & U. Scheer. (1989). Mapping of transcription units on Xenopus laevis lampbrush chromosomes by in situ hybridization with biotin-labeled cDNA probes.. PubMed. 50(1). 144–53. 8 indexed citations
5.
Scheer, U., et al.. (1988). The nuclear envelope and the organization of the pore complexes. Cell Biology International Reports. 12(9). 669–689. 49 indexed citations
6.
Benavente, Ricardo, et al.. (1988). Identification and Definition of nucleolus-related fibrillar bodies in micronucleated cells. Experimental Cell Research. 178(2). 518–523. 16 indexed citations
7.
Sommerville, John & U. Scheer. (1987). Electron microscopy in molecular biology : a practical approach. 40 indexed citations
8.
Scheer, U., K. Messner, Ronen Hazan, et al.. (1987). High sensitivity immunolocalization of double and single-stranded DNA by a monoclonal antibody.. PubMed. 43(3). 358–71. 73 indexed citations
9.
Hansmann, Paul, et al.. (1986). Ultrastructural localization of DNA in two Cryptomonas species by use of a monoclonal DNA-antibody. European Journal of Cell Biology. 42(1). 152–160. 36 indexed citations
10.
Reimer, Georg, U. Scheer, J.M. Peters, & Eng M. Tan. (1986). Immunolocalization and partial characterization of a nucleolar autoantigen (PM-Scl) associated with polymyositis/scleroderma overlap syndromes.. The Journal of Immunology. 137(12). 3802–3808. 101 indexed citations
11.
Steiner, M, et al.. (1981). Observation of hyperfine-enhanced nuclear polarisation in CoF2by means of neutron diffraction. Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics. 14(21). L597–L602. 8 indexed citations
12.
Sommerville, John & U. Scheer. (1981). Structural organization of nascent transcripts and hnRNA molecules in amphibian oocytes. Molecular Biology Reports. 7(1-3). 53–56. 8 indexed citations
13.
Scheer, U.. (1980). Structural organization of spacer chromatin between transcribed ribosomal RNA genes in amphibian oocytes.. PubMed. 23(1). 189–96. 21 indexed citations
14.
Scheer, U., John Sommerville, & Michael Bustin. (1979). Injected histone antibodies interfere with transcription of lampbrush chromosome loops in oocytes of Pleurodeles. Journal of Cell Science. 40(1). 1–20. 48 indexed citations
15.
Trendelenburg, Michael F., Werner W. Franke, & U. Scheer. (1977). Frequencies of Circular Units of Nucleolar DNA in Oocytes of Two Insects, Acheta domesticus and Dytiscus marginalis, and Changes of Nucleolar Morphology during Oogenesis. Differentiation. 7(1-3). 133–158. 18 indexed citations
16.
Scheer, U., Werner W. Franke, Michael F. Trendelenburg, & Herbert Spring. (1976). Classification of loops of lampbrush chromosomes according to the arrangement of transcriptional complexes. Journal of Cell Science. 22(3). 503–519. 57 indexed citations
17.
Franke, Werner W., U. Scheer, Herbert Spring, Michael F. Trendelenburg, & Georg Krohne. (1976). Morphology of transcriptional units of rDNA. Experimental Cell Research. 100(2). 233–244. 48 indexed citations
18.
Scheer, U.. (1972). The ultrastructure of the nuclear envelope of amphibian oocytes. Cell and Tissue Research. 127(1). 127–148. 57 indexed citations
19.
Kartenbeck, Jürgen, Hanswalter Zentgraf, U. Scheer, & Werner W. Franke. (1971). The Nuclear Envelope in Freeze-Etching. PubMed. 45(1). 3–55. 29 indexed citations
20.
Müller, Rebecca & U. Scheer. (1970). Klangspektrographische Untersuchung der Lautäusserung beim Krallenfrosch,Xenopus laevis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 26(4). 435–436. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026