U. Matthes‐Sears
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Douglas W. LarsonThomas H. NashRachael BartlettStefan SpringPeter E. KellyWalter C. OechelSteven J. HastingsR. L. Peterson
- Topics
- Lichen and fungal ecology (10 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers)Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsAtmospheric Science
- Journals
- New PhytologistOecologiaEcography
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
U. Matthes‐Sears
29 papers receiving 425 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Plant Science 224
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 221
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 180
- Global and Planetary Change 156
- Atmospheric Science 153
Countries citing papers authored by U. Matthes‐Sears
This map shows the geographic impact of U. Matthes‐Sears's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Matthes‐Sears with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Matthes‐Sears more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by U. Matthes‐Sears
This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Matthes‐Sears. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Matthes‐Sears. The network helps show where U. Matthes‐Sears may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Matthes‐Sears
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Matthes‐Sears. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Matthes‐Sears based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Matthes‐Sears. U. Matthes‐Sears is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | Sources of allozymic variation in Thuja occidentalis in southern Ontario, Canada. | 18 |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About U. Matthes‐Sears
U. Matthes‐Sears is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 29 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (10 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers) and Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (180 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (221 citations) and Atmospheric Science (153 citations). U. Matthes‐Sears has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Larson, Thomas H. Nash, Rachael Bartlett, Stefan Spring, Peter E. Kelly, Walter C. Oechel, Steven J. Hastings, R. L. Peterson, R. Lösch and L. Kappen. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Oecologia and Ecography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.