U. Hager

3.2k total citations
63 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

U. Hager is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, U. Hager has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 60 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 32 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 25 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in U. Hager's work include Nuclear physics research studies (58 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (29 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (27 papers). U. Hager is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (58 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (29 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (27 papers). U. Hager collaborates with scholars based in Finland, United States and Canada. U. Hager's co-authors include T. Eronen, A. Jokinen, J. Hakala, S. Rinta-Antila, J. Äystö, I. D. Moore, A. Kankainen, S. Rahaman, J. Rissanen and A. Saastamoinen and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

U. Hager

60 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
U. Hager Finland 22 1.2k 572 447 172 106 63 1.3k
S. Rinta-Antila Finland 23 1.5k 1.2× 661 1.2× 625 1.4× 221 1.3× 206 1.9× 101 1.7k
J. Rissanen Finland 22 1.1k 0.9× 460 0.8× 376 0.8× 118 0.7× 63 0.6× 58 1.2k
J. Szerypo Germany 20 1.4k 1.1× 750 1.3× 533 1.2× 246 1.4× 140 1.3× 81 1.6k
C. Yazidjian Germany 17 828 0.7× 463 0.8× 292 0.7× 152 0.9× 50 0.5× 34 926
V. S. Kolhinen Finland 18 853 0.7× 410 0.7× 299 0.7× 123 0.7× 84 0.8× 54 965
S. George Germany 17 720 0.6× 469 0.8× 263 0.6× 197 1.1× 41 0.4× 36 914
S. Eliseev Germany 23 1.1k 0.9× 720 1.3× 292 0.7× 246 1.4× 45 0.4× 59 1.4k
M. Rosenbusch Germany 17 607 0.5× 470 0.8× 243 0.5× 363 2.1× 88 0.8× 58 967
T. Sonoda Japan 22 917 0.7× 686 1.2× 421 0.9× 304 1.8× 138 1.3× 64 1.2k
M. Breitenfeldt Switzerland 14 541 0.4× 354 0.6× 228 0.5× 174 1.0× 88 0.8× 46 819

Countries citing papers authored by U. Hager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Hager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Hager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Hager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Hager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Hager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Hager. The network helps show where U. Hager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Hager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Hager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Hager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Hager. U. Hager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fallis, J., C. Akers, A. M. Laird, et al.. (2020). First measurement in the Gamow window of a reaction for the γ-process in inverse kinematics: 76Se(α,γ)80Kr. Physics Letters B. 807. 135575–135575. 5 indexed citations
2.
Berg, G.P.A., M. Couder, K. Smith, et al.. (2017). Design of SECAR a recoil mass separator for astrophysical capture reactions with radioactive beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 877. 87–103. 12 indexed citations
3.
Lotay, G., G. Christian, C. Ruiz, et al.. (2016). Direct Measurement of the AstrophysicalK38(p,γ)Ca39Reaction and Its Influence on the Production of Nuclides toward the End Point of Nova Nucleosynthesis. Physical Review Letters. 116(13). 132701–132701. 6 indexed citations
4.
Akers, C., A. M. Laird, Benjamin J. Fulton, et al.. (2013). Measurement of Radiative Proton Capture onF18and Implications for Oxygen-Neon Novae. Physical Review Letters. 110(26). 262502–262502. 12 indexed citations
5.
Herlert, A., S. Van Gorp, D. Beck, et al.. (2012). Recoil-ion trapping for precision mass measurements. The European Physical Journal A. 48(7). 16 indexed citations
6.
Hager, U., L. Buchmann, B. Davids, et al.. (2012). Direct measurement of the16O(α,γ)20Ne reaction atEc.m.=2.43MeV and 1.69 MeV. Physical Review C. 86(5). 6 indexed citations
7.
Hutcheon, D.A., C. Ruiz, J. Fallis, et al.. (2012). Measurement of radiative capture resonance energies with an extended gas target. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 689. 70–74. 12 indexed citations
8.
Beer, C., A. M. Laird, A. St. J. Murphy, et al.. (2011). Direct measurement of theF18(p,α)O15reaction at nova temperatures. Physical Review C. 83(4). 24 indexed citations
9.
Rahaman, S., V.-V. Elomaa, T. Eronen, et al.. (2008). Mass Measurements of Neutron-Rich Nuclei at JYFLTRAP. Acta Physica Polonica B. 39(2). 463. 1 indexed citations
10.
Eronen, T., V.-V. Elomaa, U. Hager, et al.. (2008). JYFLTRAP: Mass Spectrometry and Isomerically Clean Beams. AcPPB. 39(2). 445. 3 indexed citations
11.
Audi, G., K. Blaum, M. Dworschak, et al.. (2008). Mass Measurements beyond the Majorr-Process Waiting PointZn80. Physical Review Letters. 101(26). 262501–262501. 44 indexed citations
12.
Kankainen, A., V.-V. Elomaa, L. Batist, et al.. (2008). Mass Measurements and Implications for the Energy of the High-Spin Isomer inAg94. Physical Review Letters. 101(14). 142503–142503. 22 indexed citations
13.
Dworschak, M., G. Audi, K. Blaum, et al.. (2008). Restoration of theN=82Shell Gap from Direct Mass Measurements ofSn132,134. Physical Review Letters. 100(7). 72501–72501. 51 indexed citations
14.
Eronen, T., V.-V. Elomaa, U. Hager, et al.. (2008). QECValues of the SuperallowedβEmittersMn50andCo54. Physical Review Letters. 100(13). 132502–132502. 46 indexed citations
15.
Karvonen, P., J. Äystö, J. Billowes, et al.. (2008). Upgrade and yields of the IGISOL facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 266(19-20). 4454–4459. 16 indexed citations
16.
George, S., Β. Blank, K. Blaum, et al.. (2007). Ramsey Method of Separated Oscillatory Fields for High-Precision Penning Trap Mass Spectrometry. Physical Review Letters. 98(16). 162501–162501. 97 indexed citations
17.
Rinta-Antila, S., T. Eronen, V.-V. Elomaa, et al.. (2007). Decay study of neutron-rich zirconium isotopes employing a Penning trap as a spectroscopy tool. The European Physical Journal A. 31(1). 1–7. 32 indexed citations
18.
Hager, U., T. Eronen, J. Hakala, et al.. (2006). First Precision Mass Measurements of Refractory Fission Fragments. Physical Review Letters. 96(4). 42504–42504. 77 indexed citations
19.
Herlert, A., K. Blaum, P. Delahaye, et al.. (2006). Towards high-accuracy mass spectrometry of highly charged short-lived ions at ISOLTRAP. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 251(2-3). 131–137. 13 indexed citations
20.
Jokinen, A., Chris J. Benmore, T. Eronen, et al.. (2006). Experimental studies at JYFLTRAP. Hyperfine Interactions. 173(1-3). 143–151. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Rinta-Antila Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Rissanen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Szerypo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Yazidjian Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by V. S. Kolhinen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. George Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Eliseev Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Rosenbusch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Sonoda Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Breitenfeldt
Rankless by CCL
2026