U. Fröhlich

4.0k citations
6 papers · 10 indexed · h-index 2
Topics
Medical and Health Sciences Research (2 papers)Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (1 paper)Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper)
Journals
TAPPI JournalMedizinrechtMADOC (University of Mannheim)
Partner nations
GermanyArgentina

In The Last Decade

U. Fröhlich

5 papers receiving 9 citations

Peers

U. Fröhlich
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
  • General Health Professions 5
  • Clinical Psychology 3
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 2
Replace Natalie Maria Cormier with:
Natalie Maria Cormier Canada
Andrew Stanners United Kingdom
Sarah Bradshaw United States
Sandrine Wannepain France
E. Thomas Carazo Spain
Alice Binns United Kingdom
Augusta F. Bronner France
Albert Perry Brigham
M L Duxbury United Kingdom
J. Rasmussen United Kingdom
U. Fröhlich relative to Natalie Maria Cormier Canada Natalie Maria Cormier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natalie Maria Cormier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by U. Fröhlich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Fröhlich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Fröhlich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Fröhlich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Fröhlich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Fröhlich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Fröhlich. The network helps show where U. Fröhlich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Fröhlich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Fröhlich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Fröhlich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Fröhlich. U. Fröhlich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2
Production experience with curtain coating for woodfree coated paper
1
3
Regulus : Archetyp römischer Fides ; das sechste Buch als Schlüssel zu den Punica des Silius Italicus : Interpretation, Kommentar und Übersetzung
1
4 6
5 1
6 0

About U. Fröhlich

U. Fröhlich is a scholar working on Anthropology, Law and Archeology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 10 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical and Health Sciences Research (2 papers), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (1 paper) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (2 citations), General Health Professions (5 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (1 citation). U. Fröhlich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include P. L. Cole, Hugo F. Arellano, B. Wundheiler, A. Etchegoyen, Ricardo Alarcón, Andrés J. Kreiner, A. Lucero, Jochen Taupitz and I. Sidelnik. Their work appears in journals such as TAPPI Journal, Medizinrecht and MADOC (University of Mannheim).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026