Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
19818.4k citationsC. A. Naranjo, U. Busto et al.Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeuticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of U. Busto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Busto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Busto more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Busto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Busto. The network helps show where U. Busto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Busto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Busto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Busto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with U. Busto. U. Busto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sellers, Edward M., et al.. (1999). Risk of drug dependence and abuse posed by barbiturate-containing analgesics.. PubMed. 6(1). 18–25.11 indexed citations
6.
Busto, U., et al.. (1999). Identifying appropriate subjects for abuse liability studies using prestudy pharmacological testing.. PubMed. 6(2). 103–10.8 indexed citations
7.
Busto, U., et al.. (1998). Assessment of the risk of therapeutic dose benzodiazepine withdrawal reactions using meta-analysis. 5(3). 161–168.2 indexed citations
Romach, Myroslava K., U. Busto, Linda C. Sobell, et al.. (1991). Long-term alprazolam use: abuse, dependence or treatment?. PubMed. 27(3). 391–5.14 indexed citations
Naranjo, C. A., U. Busto, Edward M. Sellers, et al.. (1981). A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 30(2). 239–245.8382 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Domecq, C, et al.. (1980). Sex-related variations in the frequency and characteristics of adverse drug reactions.. PubMed. 18(8). 362–6.53 indexed citations
17.
Busto, U., et al.. (1978). [Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions (author's transl)].. PubMed. 106(3). 192–5.2 indexed citations
18.
Ruíz-Camps, Isabel, et al.. (1978). [A prospective drug surveillance study at the University of Chile Clinical Hospital (author's transl)].. PubMed. 106(3). 176–81.3 indexed citations
19.
Busto, U., et al.. (1978). [Drug surveillance using trained pharmacists (author's transl)].. PubMed. 106(3). 188–91.1 indexed citations
20.
Busto, U., et al.. (1976). [A prospective drug surveillance study of gi patients performed by physicians and by pharmacist (author's transl)].. PubMed. 104(10). 701–8.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.