Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of U. Breine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Breine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Breine more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Breine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Breine. The network helps show where U. Breine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Breine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Breine.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Breine based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with U. Breine. U. Breine is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Breine, U. & Per‐Ingvar Brånemark. (1980). Reconstruction of Alveolar Jaw Bone. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 14(1). 23–48.290 indexed citations
Brånemark, Per‐Ingvar, et al.. (1975). Reconstruction of the Defective Mandible. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 9(2). 116–128.118 indexed citations
Brånemark, Per‐Ingvar, et al.. (1970). Repair of Defects in Mandible. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 4(2). 100–108.38 indexed citations
9.
Adell, R, Birgit Hansson, Per‐Ingvar Brånemark, & U. Breine. (1970). Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 4(1). 19–34.397 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Pi, Brånemark, et al.. (1970). [Experimental studies on intra-osseous anchorage of dental prosthesis].. PubMed. 9–25.5 indexed citations
11.
Brånemark, Per‐Ingvar, U. Breine, R Adell, et al.. (1969). Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses:I. Experimental Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 3(2). 81–100.1386 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Brånemark, P‐I, U. Breine, Meghnad G. Joshi, & B. Urbaschek. (1968). MICROVASCULAR PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF BURNED TISSUE*. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 150(3). 474–494.52 indexed citations
Breine, U. & Bengt Johanson. (1966). Tibia as donor area of bone grafts in infants. Influence on the longitudinal growth.. PubMed. 131(3). 230–5.8 indexed citations
15.
Breine, U., et al.. (1965). HUMAN AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFTS. II. STUDIES OF THE FATE OF GRAFTS TO THE HARD PALATE IN CLEFTS BY USING TETRACYCLINE ULTRA-VIOLET FLUORESCENCE TECHNIQUE AND X-RAY MICROSCOPY.. PubMed. 129. 250–6.7 indexed citations
Breine, U., Per‐Ingvar Brånemark, & Bengt Johanson. (1961). Regeneration of bone marrow. A clinical and experimental study (preliminary report).. PubMed. 122. 125–30.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.