Tyler Barr

410 citations
9 papers · 299 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Tyler Barr

8 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Tyler Barr
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 290
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 128
  • Epidemiology 79
  • Surgery 90
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 43
Replace Fabien Chenot with:
Fabien Chenot Belgium
Lotte E. de Groot–de Laat Netherlands
Dany Debs United States
Adhiraj Chakrabarty Australia
Stephan Milhorini Pio Netherlands
Ibtihal Al Amri Netherlands
Helle Gervig Carstensen Denmark
Åshild E. Rieck Norway
Ariana González-Gómez Spain
Anne Ringlé France
Tyler Barr relative to Fabien Chenot Belgium Fabien Chenot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Fabien Chenot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tyler Barr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tyler Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyler Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyler Barr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tyler Barr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyler Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyler Barr. The network helps show where Tyler Barr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Tyler Barr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tyler Barr Line = papers co-authored together Tyler Barr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2014139
2 201447
3 201636
4 201426
5 201524
6 201619
7 20157
8 20151
9 20230

About Tyler Barr

Tyler Barr is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1 paper), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (1 paper), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (290 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (128 citations), Epidemiology (79 citations), Surgery (90 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (43 citations). Tyler Barr has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Brian P. Griffin, Milind Y. Desai, Richard A. Grimm, Andrew L. Goodman, Roosha Parikh, Shikhar Agarwal, Zoran Popović, Kenya Kusunose, L. Leonardo Rodriguez and A. Marc Gillinov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Heart Association, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging, Circulation, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and BJA Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact