Tun‐Wen Pi

895 citations
65 papers · 702 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Tun‐Wen Pi

63 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Tun‐Wen Pi
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Polymers and Plastics 128
  • Condensed Matter Physics 95
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 452
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 136
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 47
Replace H. Hänsel with:
H. Hänsel Germany
S. Söderholm Sweden
F. Heigl Canada
J. W. Chiou Taiwan
C. Scharfschwerdt Germany
Krishnakumar S. R. Menon India
Ridong Cong China
S. Isoda Japan
Ralf‐Peter Blum Germany
Howard W. H. Lee United States
Tun‐Wen Pi relative to H. Hänsel Germany H. Hänsel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
H. Hänsel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tun‐Wen Pi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tun‐Wen Pi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tun‐Wen Pi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tun‐Wen Pi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tun‐Wen Pi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tun‐Wen Pi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tun‐Wen Pi. The network helps show where Tun‐Wen Pi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tun‐Wen Pi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tun‐Wen Pi Line = papers co-authored together Tun‐Wen Pi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201660
2 200557
3 200944
4 201541
5 198834
6 200930
7 201026
8 199826
9 201324
10 201523
11 200919
12 201518
13 199818
14 200917
15 201515
16 201312
17 201712
18 199612
19 201210
20 20179

About Tun‐Wen Pi

Tun‐Wen Pi is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 65 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and devices (27 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (17 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (16 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (13 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (9 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (8 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (128 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (95 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (452 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (136 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (47 citations). Tun‐Wen Pi has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chih‐I Wu, Zhiwei Hu, Mei‐Hsin Chen, L. H. Tjeng, A. C. Komarek, Hanjie Guo, Jan‐Kai Chang, J. Kwo, Chung‐Chih Wu and Y.F. Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Applied Physics Express, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Chemistry - A European Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact