Trevor M. Fenning

1.6k total citations
28 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Trevor M. Fenning is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Biotechnology. According to data from OpenAlex, Trevor M. Fenning has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Plant Science and 8 papers in Biotechnology. Recurrent topics in Trevor M. Fenning's work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (9 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (6 papers). Trevor M. Fenning is often cited by papers focused on Plant tissue culture and regeneration (9 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (6 papers). Trevor M. Fenning collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Canada. Trevor M. Fenning's co-authors include Jonathan Gershenzon, Michael B. Jackson, Jöerg Bohlmann, Almuth Hammerbacher, Axel Schmidt, M. C. Drew, L. R. Saker, Kevan M.A. Gartland, I. J. Puddephat and Louwrance P. Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Experimental Botany and Trends in biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Trevor M. Fenning

28 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Trevor M. Fenning Germany 19 640 446 283 221 125 28 1.1k
Malin Elfstrand Sweden 24 1.2k 2.0× 488 1.1× 309 1.1× 304 1.4× 283 2.3× 66 1.6k
Celia María Gonzalo Miguel Portugal 22 1.1k 1.8× 1.2k 2.6× 95 0.3× 44 0.2× 139 1.1× 90 1.6k
Luc Harvengt France 24 858 1.3× 844 1.9× 85 0.3× 38 0.2× 84 0.7× 33 1.3k
Éric Lacombe France 15 998 1.6× 948 2.1× 46 0.2× 72 0.3× 61 0.5× 19 1.6k
Orzenil B. Silva‐Junior Brazil 22 808 1.3× 408 0.9× 96 0.3× 67 0.3× 110 0.9× 39 1.4k
Émilie Tisserant France 19 911 1.4× 455 1.0× 159 0.6× 114 0.5× 249 2.0× 24 1.2k
Charles T. Hunter United States 18 840 1.3× 541 1.2× 183 0.6× 146 0.7× 25 0.2× 33 1.2k
Jun Rong China 19 810 1.3× 538 1.2× 84 0.3× 76 0.3× 34 0.3× 50 1.2k
Pierre M. Joubert United States 10 611 1.0× 204 0.5× 162 0.6× 33 0.1× 164 1.3× 11 897
Amandine Lê Van France 7 1.3k 2.0× 287 0.6× 257 0.9× 96 0.4× 358 2.9× 10 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Trevor M. Fenning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trevor M. Fenning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trevor M. Fenning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trevor M. Fenning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trevor M. Fenning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trevor M. Fenning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trevor M. Fenning. The network helps show where Trevor M. Fenning may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trevor M. Fenning

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trevor M. Fenning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trevor M. Fenning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trevor M. Fenning. Trevor M. Fenning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Fenning, Trevor M.. (2019). The use of tissue culture and in-vitro approaches for the study of tree diseases. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 136(3). 415–430. 12 indexed citations
3.
Fenning, Trevor M., Margaret O’Donnell, & T. Connolly. (2017). An assessment of somatic embryogenesis and cryo-preservation methods with a wide range of Sitka spruce breeding material from the UK. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 131(3). 483–497. 3 indexed citations
4.
Hammerbacher, Almuth, Christian Paetz, Louwrance P. Wright, et al.. (2014). Flavan-3-ols in Norway Spruce: Biosynthesis, Accumulation, and Function in Response to Attack by the Bark Beetle-Associated Fungus Ceratocystis polonica    . PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 164(4). 2107–2122. 71 indexed citations
5.
Büchel, Kerstin, et al.. (2013). Smelling the tree and the forest: elm background odours affect egg parasitoid orientation to herbivore induced terpenoids. BioControl. 59(1). 29–43. 20 indexed citations
6.
Hammerbacher, Almuth, Axel Schmidt, Louwrance P. Wright, et al.. (2013). A Common Fungal Associate of the Spruce Bark Beetle Metabolizes the Stilbene Defenses of Norway Spruce   . PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 162(3). 1324–1336. 120 indexed citations
7.
Büchel, Kerstin, Eric T. McDowell, Anne Descour, et al.. (2012). An elm EST database for identifying leaf beetle egg-induced defense genes. BMC Genomics. 13(1). 242–242. 29 indexed citations
8.
Yan, Donghui, Trevor M. Fenning, Sha Tang, Xinli Xia, & Weilun Yin. (2012). Genome-wide transcriptional response of Populus euphratica to long-term drought stress. Plant Science. 195. 24–35. 42 indexed citations
9.
Nicole, Marie-Claude, Gazmend Zeneli, Robert Lavallée, et al.. (2006). White pine weevil (Pissodes strobi) biological performance is unaffected by the jasmonic acid or wound-induced defense response in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Tree Physiology. 26(11). 1377–1389. 13 indexed citations
10.
Fenning, Trevor M. & Kevan M.A. Gartland. (2003). Transformation Protocols for Broadleaved Trees. Humana Press eBooks. 44. 149–166. 3 indexed citations
11.
Gartland, Kevan M.A., R. C. Kellison, & Trevor M. Fenning. (2003). Forest biotechnology and Europe’s forests of the future - a challenge document for presentation and discussion at forest biotechnology in Europe: Impending barriers, policy, and implications. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 53–84. 4 indexed citations
12.
Fenning, Trevor M. & Jonathan Gershenzon. (2002). Where will the wood come from? Plantation forests and the role of biotechnology. Trends in biotechnology. 20(7). 291–296. 126 indexed citations
13.
Garland, Jeffery S., et al.. (2001). Ri-plasmid mediated transformation and regeneration of Ulmus procera (English Elm). Plant Growth Regulation. 33(2). 123–129. 21 indexed citations
14.
15.
Fenning, Trevor M., et al.. (1998). Regeneration and transformation of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) and bird cherry (Prunus padus L.). MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 249–257. 3 indexed citations
16.
Williamson, Anna‐Lise, et al.. (1998). The use of green fluorescent protein (gfp) as a reporter gene in tree genetic manipulations. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 315–320. 1 indexed citations
17.
Fenning, Trevor M., et al.. (1996). Transformation and regeneration of English elm using wild-type Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Science. 116(1). 37–46. 23 indexed citations
18.
Puddephat, I. J., T. J. Riggs, & Trevor M. Fenning. (1996). Transformation ofBrassica oleracea L.: a critical review. Molecular Breeding. 2(3). 185–210. 43 indexed citations
19.
Fenning, Trevor M., Kevan M.A. Gartland, & C. M. Brasier. (1993). Micropropagation and Regeneration of English Elm,Ulmus proceraSalisbury. Journal of Experimental Botany. 44(7). 1211–1217. 32 indexed citations
20.
Jackson, Michael B., Trevor M. Fenning, M. C. Drew, & L. R. Saker. (1985). Stimulation of ethylene production and gas-space (aerenchyma) formation in adventitious roots of Zea mays L. by small partial pressures of oxygen. Planta. 165(4). 486–492. 122 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Malin Elfstrand Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Celia María Gonzalo Miguel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luc Harvengt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Éric Lacombe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Orzenil B. Silva‐Junior Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Émilie Tisserant Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charles T. Hunter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jun Rong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pierre M. Joubert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amandine Lê Van
Rankless by CCL
2026