Trevor M. Fenning
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan GershenzonMichael B. JacksonAxel SchmidtAlmuth HammerbacherJöerg BohlmannM. C. DrewL. R. SakerKevan M.A. Gartland
- Topics
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration (9 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers)Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Trevor M. Fenning
28 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Plant Science 640
- Molecular Biology 446
- Ecology 283
- Insect Science 221
- Cell Biology 125
Countries citing papers authored by Trevor M. Fenning
This map shows the geographic impact of Trevor M. Fenning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trevor M. Fenning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trevor M. Fenning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Trevor M. Fenning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trevor M. Fenning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trevor M. Fenning. The network helps show where Trevor M. Fenning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trevor M. Fenning
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trevor M. Fenning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trevor M. Fenning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trevor M. Fenning. Trevor M. Fenning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 71 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Deployment of genetically-engineered trees in plantation forestry - an issue of concern? The science and politics of genetically modified tree plantations. | 5 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | Forest biotechnology and Europe’s forests of the future - a challenge document for presentation and discussion at forest biotechnology in Europe: Impending barriers, policy, and implications | 4 |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 126 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | Regeneration and transformation of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) and bird cherry (Prunus padus L.) | 3 |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 122 |
About Trevor M. Fenning
Trevor M. Fenning is a scholar working on Horticulture, Biotechnology and Insect Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (9 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (221 citations), Plant Science (640 citations) and Biotechnology (111 citations). Trevor M. Fenning has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Gershenzon, Michael B. Jackson, Axel Schmidt, Almuth Hammerbacher, Jöerg Bohlmann, M. C. Drew, L. R. Saker, Kevan M.A. Gartland, I. J. Puddephat and Louwrance P. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Experimental Botany and Trends in biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.