Trent Harkin

642 total citations
23 papers, 532 citations indexed

About

Trent Harkin is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Control and Systems Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Trent Harkin has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 532 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 16 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 8 papers in Control and Systems Engineering. Recurrent topics in Trent Harkin's work include Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (20 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (15 papers) and Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (8 papers). Trent Harkin is often cited by papers focused on Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (20 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (15 papers) and Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (8 papers). Trent Harkin collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Switzerland. Trent Harkin's co-authors include Barry Hooper, Andrew Hoadley, Clare Anderson, Kathryn A. Mumford, Geoffrey W. Stevens, Abdul Qader, François Maréchal, Laurence Tock, Minh T. Ho and Kathryn H. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Cleaner Production and Energy.

In The Last Decade

Trent Harkin

23 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Trent Harkin Australia 11 426 271 107 82 61 23 532
Finn Andrew Tobiesen Norway 11 656 1.5× 476 1.8× 77 0.7× 54 0.7× 35 0.6× 13 748
Patricia Mores Argentina 12 565 1.3× 327 1.2× 62 0.6× 38 0.5× 31 0.5× 19 624
Thibaut Neveux France 14 387 0.9× 281 1.0× 58 0.5× 45 0.5× 34 0.6× 28 608
Seokwon Yun South Korea 10 393 0.9× 215 0.8× 41 0.4× 39 0.5× 38 0.6× 11 477
Surinder Singh China 12 259 0.6× 171 0.6× 36 0.3× 52 0.6× 47 0.8× 21 446
Ole Biede Denmark 8 542 1.3× 379 1.4× 28 0.3× 56 0.7× 64 1.0× 14 640
Jean-Marc Amann France 3 519 1.2× 342 1.3× 36 0.3× 71 0.9× 74 1.2× 3 714
Mir-Akbar Hessami Australia 8 267 0.6× 146 0.5× 55 0.5× 56 0.7× 142 2.3× 29 577
Evgenia Mechleri United Kingdom 8 176 0.4× 79 0.3× 66 0.6× 58 0.7× 34 0.6× 13 281
Daniel Jansen Netherlands 10 437 1.0× 260 1.0× 28 0.3× 67 0.8× 53 0.9× 18 576

Countries citing papers authored by Trent Harkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trent Harkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trent Harkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trent Harkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trent Harkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trent Harkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trent Harkin. The network helps show where Trent Harkin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trent Harkin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trent Harkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trent Harkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trent Harkin. Trent Harkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Qader, Abdul, Paul A. Webley, Geoffrey W. Stevens, et al.. (2017). Learnings from CO2CRC Capture Pilot Plant Testing – Assessing Technology Development. Energy Procedia. 114. 5855–5868. 3 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Kathryn H., Trent Harkin, Kathryn A. Mumford, et al.. (2016). Outcomes from pilot plant trials of precipitating potassium carbonate solvent absorption for CO 2 capture from a brown coal fired power station in Australia. Fuel Processing Technology. 155. 252–260. 19 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Kathryn H., Kathryn A. Mumford, Dimple Mody Quyn, et al.. (2014). CO2CRC CCS Cost Reduction Project: Solvent Precipitation System. eSpace (Curtin University). 1–69. 1 indexed citations
5.
Anderson, Clare, Barry Hooper, Abdul Qader, et al.. (2014). Recent Developments in the UNO MK 3 Process–A Low Cost, Environmentally Benign Precipitating Process for CO2 Capture. Energy Procedia. 63. 1773–1780. 17 indexed citations
6.
Harkin, Trent, et al.. (2014). Analysis of a precipitating solvent absorption process for reducing CO 2 emissions from black coal fired power generation. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 29. 50–60. 4 indexed citations
7.
Harkin, Trent, et al.. (2014). CO 2 emission reduction from natural gas power stations using a precipitating solvent absorption process. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 28. 234–247. 10 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Clare, et al.. (2013). UNO MK 3 precipitating carbonate process for carbon Dioxide (CO2) capture: Cost scenarios for partial capture. 312. 3 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Kathryn H., Gongkui Xiao, Kathryn A. Mumford, et al.. (2013). Demonstration of a Concentrated Potassium Carbonate Process for CO2 Capture. Energy & Fuels. 28(1). 299–306. 71 indexed citations
10.
Anderson, Clare, Trent Harkin, Minh T. Ho, et al.. (2013). Developments in the CO2CRC UNO MK 3 Process: A Multi-component Solvent Process for Large Scale CO2 Capture. Energy Procedia. 37. 225–232. 42 indexed citations
11.
Anderson, Clare, Minh T. Ho, Trent Harkin, Dianne E. Wiley, & Barry Hooper. (2013). Large scale economics of a precipitating potassium carbonate CO2 capture process for black coal power generation. Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology. 4(1). 8–19. 7 indexed citations
12.
Tock, Laurence, et al.. (2013). An assessment of different solvent-based capture technologies within an IGCC–CCS power plant. Energy. 64. 268–276. 63 indexed citations
13.
Harkin, Trent, Andrew Hoadley, & Barry Hooper. (2012). Optimisation of power stations with carbon capture plants – the trade-off between costs and net power. Journal of Cleaner Production. 34. 98–109. 54 indexed citations
14.
Harkin, Trent, Andrew Hoadley, & Barry Hooper. (2011). A comparison of the process integration of shockwave CO2 compression with conventional turbo machinery into PCC power station design. Energy Procedia. 4. 1339–1346. 6 indexed citations
15.
Harkin, Trent, Andrew Hoadley, & Barry Hooper. (2011). Optimisation of pre-combustion capture for IGCC with a focus on the water balance. Energy Procedia. 4. 1176–1183. 7 indexed citations
16.
Harkin, Trent, Andrew Hoadley, & Barry Hooper. (2011). Using multi-objective optimisation in the design of CO2 capture systems for retrofit to coal power stations. Energy. 41(1). 228–235. 34 indexed citations
17.
Harkin, Trent, et al.. (2011). Towards large scale CCS. Energy Procedia. 4. 5549–5556. 6 indexed citations
18.
Harkin, Trent, Andrew Hoadley, & Barry Hooper. (2010). Reducing the energy penalty of CO2 capture and compression using pinch analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 18(9). 857–866. 105 indexed citations
19.
Harkin, Trent, Andrew Hoadley, & Barry Hooper. (2009). REDUCING THE ENERGY PENALTY OF CO2 CAPTURE AND STORAGE USING PINCH ANALYSIS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
20.
Harkin, Trent, Andrew Hoadley, & Barry Hooper. (2009). Process integration analysis of a brown coal-fired power station with CO2 capture and storage and lignite drying. Energy Procedia. 1(1). 3817–3825. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Finn Andrew Tobiesen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Mores Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thibaut Neveux Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Seokwon Yun Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Surinder Singh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ole Biede Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean-Marc Amann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mir-Akbar Hessami Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Evgenia Mechleri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Jansen
Rankless by CCL
2026