Trefor Aspden

15 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Trefor Aspden
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Rehabilitation 50
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 11
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 78
Replace Neela K. Patel with:
Neela K. Patel United States
Bart Thoolen Netherlands
Bob Laventure United Kingdom
Maureen Godfrey United Kingdom
Katsuko Kanagawa Japan
Gemma Randall United Kingdom
Raelle Saulson United States
Jane Horne United Kingdom
Wenna Wang China
Kian Nourozi Iran
Trefor Aspden relative to Neela K. Patel United States Neela K. Patel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Neela K. Patel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Trefor Aspden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trefor Aspden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trefor Aspden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trefor Aspden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trefor Aspden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trefor Aspden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trefor Aspden. The network helps show where Trefor Aspden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Trefor Aspden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Trefor Aspden Line = papers co-authored together Trefor Aspden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201449
2 201448
3 201837
4 201929
5 201928
6 201517
7 202011
8 201010
9 20118
10 20168
11 20148
12 20207
13 20144
14 20212
15 20241
16 20220
17
Improving psychological well-being in people recently diagnosed with visual impairment: A pilot randomised controlled trial of Problem-Solving Treatment for Visual Impairment (POSITIVE)
20150

About Trefor Aspden

Trefor Aspden is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (2 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (50 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (11 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (78 citations). Trefor Aspden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Macao. Frequent co-authors include Afsane Riazi, Fiona Jones, E. Diane Playford, Marc Serfaty, John A. Parkinson, David K. Ingledew, Louise Jones, John Wood, Sarah Davis and Kathryn Mannix. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Journal of Personalized Medicine, Psychology and Health, Health Technology Assessment and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact