Torsten Hopp

69 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

Torsten Hopp
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 92
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 48
  • Biomedical Engineering 61
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 6
  • Mechanics of Materials 27
Replace Michael Zapf with:
Michael Zapf Germany
Shaojie Tang China
Alex Sawatzky Germany
Sobhan Goudarzi Canada
William D. Richard United States
Eduardo Tavares Costa Brazil
Alexander F. Kolen Netherlands
Jochen F. Krücker United States
Mark A. Sak United States
Yongbo Wang China
Torsten Hopp relative to Michael Zapf Germany Michael Zapf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Michael Zapf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Torsten Hopp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Torsten Hopp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Torsten Hopp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Torsten Hopp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Torsten Hopp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Torsten Hopp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Torsten Hopp. The network helps show where Torsten Hopp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Torsten Hopp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Torsten Hopp Line = papers co-authored together Torsten Hopp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201264
2 201250
3 201745
4 201340
5 201135
6 201426
7 201222
8 202021
9 202120
10 201616
11 201215
12 201514
13 201713
14 201212
15 201110
16 201210
17 201310
18 201410
19 201610
20 201810

About Torsten Hopp

Torsten Hopp is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 73 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (12 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers), Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (1 paper) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (92 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (48 citations), Biomedical Engineering (61 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (6 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (27 citations). Torsten Hopp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and China. Frequent co-authors include Nicole V. Ruiter, H. Gemmeke, Michael Zapf, R. Dapp, Pascal Baltzer, Nebojsa Duric, Matthias Dietzel, W. A. Kaiser, Clemens G. Kaiser and Werner Alois Kaiser. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Radiology, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, Physics in Medicine and Biology, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery and Neurocomputing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact