Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Politics in the Periphery: Political Cleavages in Poland Interpreted in their Historical and International Context
Countries citing papers authored by Tomasz Zarycki
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomasz Zarycki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomasz Zarycki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomasz Zarycki more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomasz Zarycki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomasz Zarycki. The network helps show where Tomasz Zarycki may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomasz Zarycki
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomasz Zarycki.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomasz Zarycki based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tomasz Zarycki. Tomasz Zarycki is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zarycki, Tomasz, et al.. (2023). From Wallerstein to Rothschild. Journal of World-Systems Research. 29(1). 149–173.1 indexed citations
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2015). Modernizacja kulturowa i psychologiczna jako ideologia inteligenckiej hegemonii. Przegląd Socjologiczny. 45–68.6 indexed citations
6.
Zarycki, Tomasz, et al.. (2014). Hegemonia inteligencka: kapitał kulturowy we współczesnym polskim polu władzy — perspektywa „długiego trwania”. Kultura i Społeczeństwo. 27–49.3 indexed citations
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2014). Social dialogue under the supremacy of the intelligentsia. 5(10). 69–79.3 indexed citations
9.
Zarycki, Tomasz & Rafał Smoczyński. (2014). Revolution of the Intelligentsia on the Periphery of the Russian Empire and its Contemporary Effects: Landed Gentry’s Heritage in the Polish Model of Citizenship. 23(1). 115–136.1 indexed citations
10.
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2013). Polskie nauki społeczne w świetle hipotezy peryferyjnej dualności. 49. 67–88.3 indexed citations
11.
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2012). Poszerzając kontekst: ku krytycznej socjologii językoznawstwa. Studia Socjologiczne. 57–73.2 indexed citations
Zarycki, Tomasz, et al.. (2009). "Kapitał kulturowy. Inteligencja w Polsce i w Rosji", Tomasz Zarycki, Warszawa 2008 : [recenzja] / Jerzy Jedlicki.. Acta Poloniae Historica. 100. 252–256.11 indexed citations
14.
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2009). CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY IN THE PERIPHERIES (Socjologia krytyczna na peryferiach). Kultura i Społeczeństwo. 53(1). 105–121.
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2007). Interdyscyplinarny model stosunków centro-peryferyjnych. Propozycje teoretyczne. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.6 indexed citations
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2005). BESIEGED OUTPOST OF THE WEST, VICTIMIZATION AND OCCIDENTALIZATION IN THE REGIONALIST DISCOURSE. Kultura i Społeczeństwo. 49(2). 115–133.
19.
Zarycki, Tomasz. (2001). O niektórych dylematach współczesnych badań nad przestrzenią społeczną. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
20.
Zarycki, Tomasz. (1997). Nowa przestrzeń społeczno-polityczna Polski.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.