Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Threatened Plant, Animal, and Fungus Species in Swedish Forests: Distribution and Habitat Associations
1994551 citationsÅke Berg, B. Ehnström et al.Conservation Biologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Hallingbäck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Hallingbäck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Hallingbäck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Hallingbäck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Hallingbäck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Hallingbäck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Hallingbäck. The network helps show where Tomas Hallingbäck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomas Hallingbäck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomas Hallingbäck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomas Hallingbäck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tomas Hallingbäck. Tomas Hallingbäck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sundberg, Sebastian, Malin Aronsson, A. Dahlberg, et al.. (2015). What's new in the Swedish Red List 2015?. 109. 188–207.1 indexed citations
Hallingbäck, Tomas & Torbjörn Tyler. (2012). Mossfloran på Ölands alvar – ett nytt inventeringsprojekt.. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 22(1). 6–11.1 indexed citations
4.
Hallingbäck, Tomas, et al.. (2010). The new Swedish Red List 2010.. 104(4). 210–226.7 indexed citations
5.
Hallingbäck, Tomas, et al.. (2009). How to use the new IUCN red list categories on bryophytes. Guidelines proposed by the IUCN SSc bryophyte specialist group. 67(1). 147–157.11 indexed citations
Dia, Maria Giovanna, et al.. (2005). Seligeria acutifolia (Seligeriaceae, Musci) new to Sicily.. Flora Mediterranea. 15. 611–614.
8.
Hallingbäck, Tomas. (2003). Including bryophytes in international conventions--a success story from Europe (Selected Papers Presented at The World Conference of Bryology, Lucknow, India, January 23-30, 2002). Journal of The Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 201–214.4 indexed citations
9.
Hallingbäck, Tomas. (2002). GLOBALLY WIDESPREAD BRYOPHYTES, BUT RARE IN EUROPE. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 20(1). 11–24.15 indexed citations
Hallingbäck, Tomas. (1998). Threats and protection of bryophytes in Sweden (Proceedings of the IAB Symposium on 2000′s Bryology,Beijing China,May 26-31,1997). Journal of The Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 175–185.5 indexed citations
Berg, Åke, B. Ehnström, Lena Gustafsson, et al.. (1994). Threatened Plant, Animal, and Fungus Species in Swedish Forests: Distribution and Habitat Associations. Conservation Biology. 8(3). 718–731.551 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.