Tom Zick

843 total citations
22 papers, 500 citations indexed

About

Tom Zick is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Zick has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 500 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Tom Zick's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (20 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (12 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers). Tom Zick is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (20 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (12 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers). Tom Zick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Tom Zick's co-authors include Mariska Kriek, Alison L. Coil, Brian Siana, Mojegan Azadi, Naveen A. Reddy, Alice E. Shapley, William R. Freeman, Irene Shivaei, Bahram Mobasher and Sedona H. Price and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

In The Last Decade

Tom Zick

22 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Zick United States 12 473 220 26 15 13 22 500
Christopher D. Impey United States 9 440 0.9× 201 0.9× 57 2.2× 27 1.8× 13 1.0× 13 459
Chen Cao China 10 388 0.8× 156 0.7× 20 0.8× 8 0.5× 11 0.8× 25 405
Mark Neeser Germany 8 336 0.7× 145 0.7× 45 1.7× 8 0.5× 23 1.8× 15 358
Omar Lopez‐Cruz Mexico 10 374 0.8× 207 0.9× 36 1.4× 20 1.3× 18 1.4× 31 387
Pamela M. Marcum United States 12 377 0.8× 171 0.8× 36 1.4× 12 0.8× 10 0.8× 30 396
Juan Rafael Martínez-Galarza United States 12 323 0.7× 91 0.4× 74 2.8× 8 0.5× 9 0.7× 24 353
Mark L. A. Richardson United States 7 343 0.7× 134 0.6× 78 3.0× 7 0.5× 12 0.9× 15 352
M. Relaño Spain 17 697 1.5× 192 0.9× 50 1.9× 16 1.1× 15 1.2× 39 713
T. Marquart Sweden 11 224 0.5× 92 0.4× 30 1.2× 9 0.6× 16 1.2× 20 239
Yoshinobu Fudamoto Japan 12 431 0.9× 198 0.9× 48 1.8× 8 0.5× 14 1.1× 31 452

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Zick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Zick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Zick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Zick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Zick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Zick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Zick. The network helps show where Tom Zick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Zick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Zick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Zick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Zick. Tom Zick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gilbert, Thomas Krendl, et al.. (2023). Reward Reports for Reinforcement Learning. 84–130. 11 indexed citations
2.
Fetherolf, Tara, Naveen A. Reddy, Alice E. Shapley, et al.. (2022). The MOSDEF survey: probing resolved stellar populations at z ∼ 2 Using a new bayesian-defined morphology metric called patchiness. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 518(3). 4214–4237. 2 indexed citations
3.
Shapley, Alice E., Ryan L. Sanders, Mariska Kriek, et al.. (2022). The MOSDEF survey: towards a complete census of the z ∼ 2.3 star-forming galaxy population. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 517(3). 4337–4354. 3 indexed citations
4.
Shapley, Alice E., Mariska Kriek, Michele Cappellari, et al.. (2022). The MOSDEF survey: a new view of a remarkable z = 1.89 merger. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 517(3). 4405–4416. 1 indexed citations
5.
Fetherolf, Tara, Naveen A. Reddy, Alice E. Shapley, et al.. (2021). The MOSDEF survey: the dependence of H α-to-UV SFR ratios on SFR and size at z ∼ 2. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 508(1). 1431–1445. 6 indexed citations
6.
Shapley, Alice E., Ryan L. Sanders, Michael W. Topping, et al.. (2021). The MOSDEF survey: a comprehensive analysis of the rest-optical emission-line properties of z ∼ 2.3 star-forming galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 502(2). 2600–2614. 25 indexed citations
7.
Topping, Michael W., Alice E. Shapley, Ryan L. Sanders, et al.. (2021). The MOSDEF survey: the mass–metallicity relationship and the existence of the FMR at z ∼ 1.5. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 506(1). 1237–1249. 16 indexed citations
8.
Zuckerman, Ethan, et al.. (2021). A meta-proposal for Twitter's bluesky project. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
9.
Price, Sedona H., Mariska Kriek, Guillermo Barro, et al.. (2020). The MOSDEF Survey: Kinematic and Structural Evolution of Star-forming Galaxies at 1.4 ≤ z ≤ 3.8. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 9 indexed citations
10.
Shapley, Alice E., Ryan L. Sanders, Michael W. Topping, et al.. (2020). The MOSDEF Survey: Neon as a Probe of ISM Physical Conditions at High Redshift*. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 902(1). L16–L16. 19 indexed citations
11.
Reddy, Naveen A., Alice E. Shapley, Mariska Kriek, et al.. (2020). The MOSDEF Survey: The First Direct Measurements of the Nebular Dust Attenuation Curve at High Redshift*. The Astrophysical Journal. 902(2). 123–123. 55 indexed citations
12.
Zick, Tom, Daniel R. Weisz, B. Ribeiro, et al.. (2020). Towards studying hierarchical assembly in real time: a Milky Way progenitor galaxy at z = 2.36 under the microscope. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 493(4). 5653–5661. 6 indexed citations
13.
Shapley, Alice E., Ryan L. Sanders, Bahram Mobasher, et al.. (2020). The MOSDEF survey: differences in SFR and metallicity for morphologically selected mergers at z ∼ 2. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 501(1). 137–145. 8 indexed citations
14.
Sanders, Ryan L., Tucker Jones, Alice E. Shapley, et al.. (2019). The MOSDEF Survey: [S iii] as a New Probe of Evolving Interstellar Medium Conditions*. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 888(1). L11–L11. 15 indexed citations
15.
Fornasini, Francesca M., Mariska Kriek, Ryan L. Sanders, et al.. (2019). The MOSDEF Survey: The Metallicity Dependence of X-Ray Binary Populations at z ∼ 2. The Astrophysical Journal. 885(1). 65–65. 26 indexed citations
16.
Shapley, Alice E., Ryan L. Sanders, Naveen A. Reddy, et al.. (2019). The MOSDEF Survey: No Significant Enhancement in Star Formation or Deficit in Metallicity in Merging Galaxy Pairs at 1.5 ≲ z ≲ 3.5∗. The Astrophysical Journal. 874(1). 18–18. 9 indexed citations
17.
Reddy, Naveen A., Alice E. Shapley, Ryan L. Sanders, et al.. (2018). The MOSDEF Survey: Significant Evolution in the Rest-frame Optical Emission Line Equivalent Widths of Star-forming Galaxies at z = 1.4–3.8. The Astrophysical Journal. 869(2). 92–92. 78 indexed citations
18.
Azadi, Mojegan, Alison L. Coil, James Aird, et al.. (2018). The MOSDEF Survey: The Nature of Mid-infrared Excess Galaxies and a Comparison of IR and UV Star Formation Tracers at z ∼ 2. The Astrophysical Journal. 866(1). 63–63. 17 indexed citations
19.
Zick, Tom, Daniel R. Weisz, & Michael Boylan-Kolchin. (2018). Globular clusters in high-redshift dwarf galaxies: a case study from the Local Group. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 477(1). 480–490. 21 indexed citations
20.
Price, Sedona H., Mariska Kriek, Alice E. Shapley, et al.. (2016). THE MOSDEF SURVEY: DYNAMICAL and BARYONIC MASSES and KINEMATIC STRUCTURES of STAR-FORMING GALAXIES at 1.4 ⤠z ⤠2.6. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christopher D. Impey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chen Cao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark Neeser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Omar Lopez‐Cruz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pamela M. Marcum Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juan Rafael Martínez-Galarza Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark L. A. Richardson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Relaño Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Marquart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yoshinobu Fudamoto
Rankless by CCL
2026