Tom W. Bargar

612 total citations
9 papers, 487 citations indexed

About

Tom W. Bargar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom W. Bargar has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 487 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Cell Biology and 1 paper in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Tom W. Bargar's work include Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (1 paper) and T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (1 paper). Tom W. Bargar is often cited by papers focused on Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (1 paper) and T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (1 paper). Tom W. Bargar collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Tom W. Bargar's co-authors include Vinod Labhasetwar, Swayam Prabha, Jayanth Panyam, Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo, V.A. Kabanov, Alexander V. Kabanov, Tatiana K. Bronich, Adi Eisenberg, Sergey V. Solomatin and Xiangde Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Langmuir and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Tom W. Bargar

9 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom W. Bargar United States 7 168 154 88 72 66 9 487
Caroline Roques France 10 129 0.8× 140 0.9× 153 1.7× 44 0.6× 83 1.3× 15 480
Guy Yealland Germany 8 136 0.8× 206 1.3× 91 1.0× 111 1.5× 94 1.4× 12 434
Yoshihisa Kaneda Japan 13 295 1.8× 191 1.2× 98 1.1× 40 0.6× 115 1.7× 36 651
Woei Ping Cheng United Kingdom 12 186 1.1× 184 1.2× 77 0.9× 124 1.7× 101 1.5× 14 465
Othman Al-Hanbali Jordan 9 136 0.8× 178 1.2× 38 0.4× 116 1.6× 93 1.4× 13 508
Phin Peng Lee United States 6 133 0.8× 222 1.4× 148 1.7× 96 1.3× 183 2.8× 7 558
Lingjie Ke China 13 105 0.6× 137 0.9× 38 0.4× 47 0.7× 191 2.9× 19 431
Hemda Baabur‐Cohen Israel 7 188 1.1× 295 1.9× 65 0.7× 60 0.8× 189 2.9× 8 500
Naomi M. Hamelmann Netherlands 11 126 0.8× 180 1.2× 110 1.3× 34 0.5× 112 1.7× 14 439
Girish Kore India 6 276 1.6× 262 1.7× 90 1.0× 103 1.4× 185 2.8× 6 666

Countries citing papers authored by Tom W. Bargar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom W. Bargar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom W. Bargar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom W. Bargar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom W. Bargar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom W. Bargar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom W. Bargar. The network helps show where Tom W. Bargar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom W. Bargar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom W. Bargar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom W. Bargar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom W. Bargar. Tom W. Bargar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Moxley, Rodney A., Tom W. Bargar, Stephen D. Kachman, Diane R. Baker, & David Francis. (2020). Intimate Attachment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to Urinary Bladder Epithelium in the Gnotobiotic Piglet Model. Microorganisms. 8(2). 263–263. 8 indexed citations
2.
Luan, Yi, et al.. (2020). Continuous treatment with cisplatin induces the oocyte death of primordial follicles without activation. The FASEB Journal. 34(10). 13885–13899. 25 indexed citations
3.
Triplett, Aleata A., et al.. (2016). Casitas B-cell lymphoma (Cbl) proteins protect mammary epithelial cells from proteotoxicity of active c-Src accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(51). E8228–E8237. 6 indexed citations
4.
Togo, Shinsaku, Tadashi Sato, Hisatoshi Sugiura, et al.. (2010). Differentiation of embryonic stem cells into fibroblast-like cells in three-dimensional type I collagen gel cultures. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal. 47(2). 114–124. 15 indexed citations
5.
Rainey, Mark A., Manju George, Guoguang Ying, et al.. (2010). The endocytic recycling regulator EHD1 is essential for spermatogenesis and male fertility in mice. BMC Developmental Biology. 10(1). 37–37. 48 indexed citations
6.
Sugiura, Hisatoshi, Xiangde Liu, Fenghai Duan, et al.. (2007). Cultured Lung Fibroblasts from Ovalbumin-Challenged “Asthmatic” Mice Differ Functionally from Normal. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 37(4). 424–430. 43 indexed citations
8.
Panyam, Jayanth, Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo, Swayam Prabha, Tom W. Bargar, & Vinod Labhasetwar. (2003). Fluorescence and electron microscopy probes for cellular and tissue uptake of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 262(1-2). 1–11. 241 indexed citations
9.
Solomatin, Sergey V., Tatiana K. Bronich, Tom W. Bargar, et al.. (2003). Environmentally Responsive Nanoparticles from Block Ionomer Complexes:  Effects of pH and Ionic Strength. Langmuir. 19(19). 8069–8076. 100 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026