Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What is Sustainability?
2010729 citationsTom Kuhlman, John Farringtonprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Kuhlman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Kuhlman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Kuhlman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Kuhlman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Kuhlman. The network helps show where Tom Kuhlman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Kuhlman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Kuhlman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Kuhlman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Kuhlman. Tom Kuhlman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Polman, Nico, et al.. (2016). Governance of ecosystem services on small islands. Island Studies Journal. 11(1). 265–284.1 indexed citations
2.
Zander, Peter, T.S. Amjath-Babu, Sara Preißel, et al.. (2016). Grain legume decline and potential recovery in European agriculture. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 36(2).1 indexed citations
Delden, Hedwig van, Jasper van Vliet, Jan Erik Petersen, et al.. (2012). Exploring land use trends in Europe: a comparison of forecasting approaches and results. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2040–2047.1 indexed citations
Kuhlman, Tom, Frank van Tongeren, J.F.M. Helming, et al.. (2006). Future land-use change in the Netherlands: an analysis based on a chain of models Zukünftige Landnutzungsveränderungen in den Niederlanden: eine Analyse durch eine Modellkette.
13.
Kuhlman, Tom, et al.. (2005). Linking Models in Land Use Simulation: Application of the Land Use Scanner to Changes in Agricultural Area. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.2 indexed citations
Kuhlman, Tom. (2002). A case study of Liberian refugees in Côte d'Ivoire.1 indexed citations
16.
Kuhlman, Tom. (1990). Organized versus spontaneous settlement of refugees in Africa. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).8 indexed citations
17.
Kuhlman, Tom, et al.. (1990). Enduring crisis: refugee problems in eastern Sudan. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).4 indexed citations
18.
Kuhlman, Tom. (1990). Towards a definition of refugees. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
19.
Kuhlman, Tom. (1990). The economic integration of refugees in developing countries. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).2 indexed citations
20.
Kuhlman, Tom, et al.. (1987). Refugees and regional development: final report of the research project 'Eritreans in Kassala'. 540.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.