Tom Knight

2.2k total citations
2 papers, 14 citations indexed

About

Tom Knight is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Knight has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 14 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Surgery, 1 paper in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 1 paper in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Tom Knight's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper) and Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper). Tom Knight is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper) and Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper). Tom Knight collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Tom Knight's co-authors include Neil Rasburn and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.

In The Last Decade

Tom Knight

2 papers receiving 13 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tom Knight United Kingdom	2	9	4	3	2	2	2	14
M. Cartal France	2	7 0.8×	4 1.0×				3	14
F. Heid Switzerland	3	7 0.8×	4 1.0×		1 0.5×		3	9
Chimaobi Tim Nnaji Nigeria	2	5 0.6×	4 1.0×				3	5
Eleanor Massie United Kingdom	2	8 0.9×	2 0.5×				4	10
P. Diaz Spain	1	14 1.6×	6 1.5×		1 0.5×		2	14
J Netkovski North Macedonia	2	7 0.8×	2 0.5×				5	11
Eino van Duyn Netherlands	1	9 1.0×	6 1.5×				2	10
Marina Terzitta Italy	3	4 0.4×	4 1.0×				7	12
Taimoor Khan Pakistan	2	5 0.6×	7 1.8×				2	10
Chris Beaver Canada	3	5 0.6×	6 1.5×				5	15

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Knight

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Knight

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Knight. The network helps show where Tom Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Knight. Tom Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Knight, Tom, et al.. (2018). Early Versus Late Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resection. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 33(2). 453–459. 9 indexed citations

2.

Knight, Tom, et al.. (2004). The National Library for Health. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 87(1). 30–31. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact