Tom Blomley

1.4k total citations
14 papers, 539 citations indexed

About

Tom Blomley is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Blomley has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 539 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 4 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Tom Blomley's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (11 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (2 papers). Tom Blomley is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (11 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (2 papers). Tom Blomley collaborates with scholars based in Tanzania, United Kingdom and Denmark. Tom Blomley's co-authors include Neil D. Burgess, Lauren Persha, Antje Ahrends, Eliakimu Zahabu, Christian Held, Timm Tennigkeit, Paul J. Harrison, Meine van Noordwijk, Beria Leimona and S.A.O. Chamshama and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Oryx and The International Forestry Review.

In The Last Decade

Tom Blomley

14 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Blomley Tanzania 11 441 106 101 100 86 14 539
Y.B. Malla United Kingdom 10 461 1.0× 93 0.9× 89 0.9× 120 1.2× 56 0.7× 16 586
James Mayers United Kingdom 13 418 0.9× 81 0.8× 72 0.7× 100 1.0× 74 0.9× 31 571
Doug Boucher United States 8 360 0.8× 116 1.1× 52 0.5× 65 0.7× 87 1.0× 18 495
Adcharaporn Pagdee Thailand 6 454 1.0× 115 1.1× 71 0.7× 78 0.8× 83 1.0× 16 546
Bir Bahadur Khanal Chhetri Nepal 15 428 1.0× 161 1.5× 82 0.8× 88 0.9× 53 0.6× 40 596
T. Enters United Kingdom 11 474 1.1× 99 0.9× 72 0.7× 128 1.3× 72 0.8× 26 630
H. Carolyn Peach Brown Canada 13 406 0.9× 71 0.7× 64 0.6× 108 1.1× 74 0.9× 26 602
Naya Sharma Paudel Australia 14 507 1.1× 126 1.2× 62 0.6× 82 0.8× 59 0.7× 53 668
Roberto Porro Brazil 14 541 1.2× 122 1.2× 112 1.1× 233 2.3× 101 1.2× 57 747
Frances Seymour United States 13 470 1.1× 137 1.3× 51 0.5× 73 0.7× 159 1.8× 33 665

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Blomley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Blomley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Blomley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Blomley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Blomley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Blomley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Blomley. The network helps show where Tom Blomley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Blomley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Blomley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Blomley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Blomley. Tom Blomley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Blomley, Tom, et al.. (2017). When community forestry meets REDD+: has REDD+ helped address implementation barriers to participatory forest management in Tanzania?. Journal of Eastern African Studies. 11(3). 549–570. 21 indexed citations
2.
Blomley, Tom, et al.. (2016). REDD+ hits the ground: lessons learned from Tanzania's REDD+ pilot projects.. 7 indexed citations
3.
Treue, Thorsten, Henrik Meilby, Jens Friis Lund, et al.. (2014). Does participatory forest management promote sustainable forest utilisation in Tanzania?. The International Forestry Review. 16(1). 23–38. 52 indexed citations
4.
Blomley, Tom, et al.. (2013). ‘Land grabbing’: is conservation part of the problem or the solution?. 3 indexed citations
5.
Held, Christian, et al.. (2012). A bottom-up approach to estimating cost elements of REDD+ pilot projects in Tanzania. Carbon Balance and Management. 7(1). 9–9. 27 indexed citations
6.
Harrison, Paul J., et al.. (2012). Towards operational payments for water ecosystem services in Tanzania: a case study from the Uluguru Mountains. Oryx. 46(1). 34–44. 60 indexed citations
7.
Blomley, Tom, et al.. (2011). Participatory Forest Management and REDD+ in Tanzania. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. 13 indexed citations
8.
Infield, Mark, William Olupot, Julia Baker, et al.. (2010). Development and gorillas? : assessing fifteen years of integrated conservation and development in south-western Uganda. 32 indexed citations
9.
Persha, Lauren & Tom Blomley. (2009). Management Decentralization and Montane Forest Conditions in Tanzania. Conservation Biology. 23(6). 1485–1496. 65 indexed citations
10.
12.
Blomley, Tom, et al.. (2006). Going to scale with Participatory Forest Management: early lessons from Tanzania. The International Forestry Review. 8(1). 93–100. 88 indexed citations
13.
Blomley, Tom. (2000). Woodlots, Woodfuel and Wildlife: Lessons from Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. Nursing Children and Young People. 26(3). 7–7. 19 indexed citations
14.
Blomley, Tom. (1994). Indigenous agroforestry: Melia volkensii in Kenya.. 6(4). 10–11. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026