Tojo Nakayama
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Epilepsy research and treatment 10
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 4
-
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 9
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 5
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 4
-
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 3
-
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 3
- RNA modifications and cancer 3
- Co-authors
- Mitsugu UematsuShigeru TsuchiyaHideyuki OhtaniYushi InoueIkuo OgiwaraEmi MazakiShigeo KureKazuhiro Yamakawa
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tojo Nakayama
29 papers receiving 470 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Psychiatry and Mental health 164
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 134
- Genetics 165
- Clinical Biochemistry 24
- Molecular Biology 240
Countries citing papers authored by Tojo Nakayama
This map shows the geographic impact of Tojo Nakayama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tojo Nakayama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tojo Nakayama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tojo Nakayama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tojo Nakayama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tojo Nakayama. The network helps show where Tojo Nakayama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tojo Nakayama, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 70 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 20 | Case of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 showing high intensity lesions in the frontal white matter on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. | 2001 | 6 |
About Tojo Nakayama
Tojo Nakayama is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Biochemistry and Genetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (10 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (9 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (5 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (164 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (134 citations) and Genetics (165 citations). Tojo Nakayama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mitsugu Uematsu, Shigeru Tsuchiya, Hideyuki Ohtani, Yushi Inoue, Ikuo Ogiwara, Emi Mazaki, Shigeo Kure, Kazuhiro Yamakawa, Naomi Hino‐Fukuyo and Kazuhiro Haginoya. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and Human Mutation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.