T.L. Catchpole

591 total citations
9 papers, 478 citations indexed

About

T.L. Catchpole is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Aquatic Science. According to data from OpenAlex, T.L. Catchpole has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 478 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 4 papers in Aquatic Science. Recurrent topics in T.L. Catchpole's work include Marine and fisheries research (9 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers) and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (4 papers). T.L. Catchpole is often cited by papers focused on Marine and fisheries research (9 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers) and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (4 papers). T.L. Catchpole collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Italy. T.L. Catchpole's co-authors include C.L.J. Frid, Tim Gray, A.S. Revill, Alastair Grant, Jordan P. Feekings, M Rochet, Niels Madsen, Natacha Nikolic, Andreas Palialexis and J. Valeiras and has published in prestigious journals such as Marine Ecology Progress Series, ICES Journal of Marine Science and Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

In The Last Decade

T.L. Catchpole

9 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
T.L. Catchpole United Kingdom	8	436	293	156	72	25	9	478
Tom Catchpole United Kingdom	7	353 0.8×	208 0.7×	150 1.0×	58 0.8×	20 0.8×	9	391
Sonia Méhault France	13	287 0.7×	188 0.6×	142 0.9×	59 0.8×	20 0.8×	33	349
A.S. Revill United Kingdom	11	298 0.7×	221 0.8×	101 0.6×	40 0.6×	11 0.4×	16	341
Holger Hovgård Denmark	11	273 0.6×	209 0.7×	126 0.8×	112 1.6×	20 0.8×	17	381
A.T.M. van Helmond Netherlands	9	229 0.5×	170 0.6×	120 0.8×	89 1.2×	24 1.0×	20	339
Fabien Forget France	13	310 0.7×	264 0.9×	276 1.8×	52 0.7×	26 1.0×	34	444
Thomas Catchpole United Kingdom	11	278 0.6×	149 0.5×	123 0.8×	42 0.6×	17 0.7×	16	316
Jean-Pierre Hallier France	9	357 0.8×	206 0.7×	271 1.7×	91 1.3×	23 0.9×	21	438
Andrew S. Revill United Kingdom	12	340 0.8×	242 0.8×	126 0.8×	61 0.8×	7 0.3×	13	415
Norman Graham Ireland	14	418 1.0×	233 0.8×	191 1.2×	69 1.0×	14 0.6×	35	467

Countries citing papers authored by T.L. Catchpole

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.L. Catchpole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.L. Catchpole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.L. Catchpole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.L. Catchpole

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.L. Catchpole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.L. Catchpole. The network helps show where T.L. Catchpole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T.L. Catchpole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T.L. Catchpole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T.L. Catchpole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T.L. Catchpole. T.L. Catchpole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Ford, Jennifer S., David Maxwell, Evalyne W. Muiruri, & T.L. Catchpole. (2020). Modifying selectivity to reduce unwanted catches in an English trammel net and gill net common sole fishery. Fisheries Research. 227. 105531–105531. 4 indexed citations

2.

Grant, Alastair, et al.. (2013). Incentivising selective fishing under a policy to ban discards; lessons from European and global fisheries. Marine Policy. 45. 287–292. 81 indexed citations

3.

Catchpole, T.L., Jordan P. Feekings, Niels Madsen, et al.. (2013). Using inferred drivers of discarding behaviour to evaluate discard mitigation measures. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 71(5). 1277–1285. 46 indexed citations

4.

Catchpole, T.L. & A.S. Revill. (2007). Gear technology in Nephrops trawl fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 18(1). 17–31. 72 indexed citations

5.

Revill, A.S., et al.. (2007). Recent work to improve the efficacy of square-mesh panels used in a North Sea Nephrops norvegicus directed fishery. Fisheries Research. 85(3). 321–327. 15 indexed citations

6.

Catchpole, T.L., et al.. (2006). Importance of discards from the English Nephrops norvegicus fishery in the North Sea to marine scavengers. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 313. 215–226. 36 indexed citations

7.

Catchpole, T.L., et al.. (2006). An assessment of the Swedish grid and square-mesh codend in the English (Farn Deeps) Nephrops fishery. Fisheries Research. 81(2-3). 118–125. 33 indexed citations

8.

Catchpole, T.L., C.L.J. Frid, & Tim Gray. (2004). Discards in North Sea fisheries: causes, consequences and solutions. Marine Policy. 29(5). 421–430. 146 indexed citations

9.

Catchpole, T.L., C.L.J. Frid, & Tim Gray. (2004). Discarding in the English north-east coast Nephrops norvegicus fishery: the role of social and environmental factors. Fisheries Research. 72(1). 45–54. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact