Tìsa Wenger
About
In The Last Decade
Tìsa Wenger
7 papers receiving 97 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Sociology and Political Science 105
- Political Science and International Relations 47
- History 18
- Philosophy 15
- Health 14
Countries citing papers authored by Tìsa Wenger
This map shows the geographic impact of Tìsa Wenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tìsa Wenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tìsa Wenger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tìsa Wenger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tìsa Wenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tìsa Wenger. The network helps show where Tìsa Wenger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tìsa Wenger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tìsa Wenger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tìsa Wenger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tìsa Wenger. Tìsa Wenger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 48 | |
| 4 | Religious Freedom: The Contested History of an American Ideal | 19 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.