Tim Grant

543 total citations
10 papers, 457 citations indexed

About

Tim Grant is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Grant has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 457 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Tim Grant's work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (9 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers). Tim Grant is often cited by papers focused on Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (9 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers). Tim Grant collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Tim Grant's co-authors include Brien A. Holden, Deborah F. Sweeney, Donna La Hood, Arthur Back, Cristina M. Schnider, Robert Terry, Mark Willcox, Bill Long, Helen A. Swarbrick and Claire M. Vajdic and has published in prestigious journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice and Contact Lens and Anterior Eye.

In The Last Decade

Tim Grant

10 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tim Grant Australia	6	407	264	233	55	52	10	457
Donna La Hood Australia	7	436 1.1×	294 1.1×	343 1.5×	49 0.9×	178 3.4×	9	561
P. Pouliquen France	11	500 1.2×	493 1.9×	261 1.1×	59 1.1×	40 0.8×	23	707
Beth T. Kinoshita United States	11	496 1.2×	322 1.2×	289 1.2×	47 0.9×	212 4.1×	26	616
Dawn Y. Lam United States	12	473 1.2×	403 1.5×	297 1.3×	46 0.8×	208 4.0×	28	701
Joanna E. Graham United Kingdom	5	248 0.6×	210 0.8×	85 0.4×	35 0.6×	15 0.3×	7	347
Jennie Diec Australia	13	433 1.1×	228 0.9×	333 1.4×	27 0.5×	211 4.1×	31	527
Peter Bergenske United States	10	277 0.7×	107 0.4×	175 0.8×	33 0.6×	82 1.6×	24	307
Divya M. Varu United States	8	304 0.7×	309 1.2×	160 0.7×	97 1.8×	38 0.7×	12	524
Patrick M. Ladage United States	16	679 1.7×	367 1.4×	591 2.5×	13 0.2×	61 1.2×	26	804
Sevda Aydın Kurna Türkiye	12	236 0.6×	228 0.9×	267 1.1×	12 0.2×	94 1.8×	42	435

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Grant

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Grant

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Grant. The network helps show where Tim Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Grant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Grant. Tim Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Sweeney, Deborah F., Bruce H. Koffler, Tim Grant, et al.. (2003). Session II: What Other Nonoxygen-Related Design Factors Affect Lens Performance?. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. S57–S59. 1 indexed citations

2.

Long, Bill, et al.. (2000). Six months of in-practice experience with a high Dk lotrafilcon a soft contact lens. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 23(4). 112–118. 14 indexed citations

3.

Grant, Tim, et al.. (1998). Contact lens induced peripheral ulcers during hydrogel contact lens wear.. PubMed. 24(3). 145–51. 27 indexed citations

4.

Holden, Brien A., et al.. (1996). Gram-negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses.. PubMed. 22(1). 47–52. 126 indexed citations

5.

Grant, Tim, et al.. (1995). High water content versus low water content—Does monthly replacement affect the difference?. International Contact Lens Clinic. 22(9-10). 198–202. 2 indexed citations

6.

Terry, Robert, Cristina M. Schnider, Brien A. Holden, et al.. (1993). CCLRU Standards for Success of Daily and Extended Wear Contact Lenses. Optometry and Vision Science. 70(3). 234–243. 256 indexed citations

7.

Grant, Tim, et al.. (1992). Clinical performance of two opaque, tinted soft contact lenses.. PubMed. 63(5). 344–9. 10 indexed citations

8.

Grant, Tim & Brien A. Holden. (1988). The clinical performance of disposable (58%) extended wear lenses. Journal of The British Contact Lens Association. 11. 63–64. 5 indexed citations

9.

Grant, Tim, et al.. (1987). The value of regular replacement of low water content contact lenses for extended wear.. PubMed. 58(6). 461–4. 15 indexed citations

10.

Grant, Tim, et al.. (1986). Evaluation of current care and maintenance systems for hydrogel extended wear. Journal of The British Contact Lens Association. 9. 66–67. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact