Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, Version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, Validations, and Intercomparisons
20172.3k citationsBoyin Huang, Peter Thorne et al.Journal of Climateprofile →
Warming of the world ocean, 1955–2003
2005814 citationsSydney Levitus, John I. Antonov et al.Geophysical Research Lettersprofile →
Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015
2017523 citationsLijing Cheng, Kevin E. Trenberth et al.Science Advancesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Boyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Boyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Boyer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Boyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Boyer. The network helps show where Tim Boyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Boyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Boyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Boyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Boyer. Tim Boyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Blunden, Jessica & Tim Boyer. (2021). State of the Climate in 2020. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 102(8). S1–S475.56 indexed citations
Huang, Boyin, Peter Thorne, Viva F. Banzon, et al.. (2017). Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, Version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, Validations, and Intercomparisons. Journal of Climate. 30(20). 8179–8205.2343 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Cheng, Lijing, Kevin E. Trenberth, John Fasullo, et al.. (2017). Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015. Science Advances. 3(3). e1601545–e1601545.523 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Tyler, Robert H., Tim Boyer, Takuto Minami, M. Zweng, & James Reagan. (2017). Electrical conductivity of the global ocean. Earth Planets and Space. 69(1). 156–156.107 indexed citations
13.
Boyer, Tim, et al.. (2016). NCEI-TSG: A Global in situ Sea-surface Salinity and Temperature Database of Thermosalinograph (TSG) Observations. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2016.1 indexed citations
Locarnini, Ricardo, Sydney Levitus, Tim Boyer, et al.. (2012). World Ocean Atlas 2013: Improved vertical and horizontal resolution. AGUFM. 2012.2 indexed citations
16.
Xue, Yan, Magdalena Balmaseda, Tim Boyer, et al.. (2012). Comparative Analysis of Upper Ocean Heat Content Variability from Ensemble Operational Ocean Analyses. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 9(1).3 indexed citations
Levitus, Sydney, John I. Antonov, & Tim Boyer. (2005). Warming of the world ocean, 1955–2003. Geophysical Research Letters. 32(2).814 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.