Thomas White

3.8k total citations
29 papers, 545 citations indexed

About

Thomas White is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Economics and Econometrics and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas White has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 545 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 14 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Thomas White's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (15 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (12 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers). Thomas White is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (15 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (12 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers). Thomas White collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Thomas White's co-authors include William J. Sutherland, Silviu O. Petrovan, Alex Richter, Andrew Bosworth, Megan Mayhew, Jeremy Mirza, Angus Best, Michael Kidd, Liam Crawford and Benita Percival and has published in prestigious journals such as Genetics, PLoS Biology and The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Thomas White

26 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas White United Kingdom 13 183 105 93 91 75 29 545
Rachelle N. Binny New Zealand 17 105 0.6× 57 0.5× 59 0.6× 11 0.1× 48 0.6× 44 605
William J. M. Probert United Kingdom 14 103 0.6× 85 0.8× 129 1.4× 41 0.5× 101 1.3× 33 642
Hiromu Ito Japan 16 41 0.2× 48 0.5× 46 0.5× 23 0.3× 18 0.2× 59 1.1k
Thuy Nguyen United States 14 60 0.3× 118 1.1× 33 0.4× 28 0.3× 37 0.5× 25 646
Lei Cao China 12 63 0.3× 133 1.3× 61 0.7× 19 0.2× 24 0.3× 58 503
Gayathri Vaidyanathan India 10 100 0.5× 21 0.2× 37 0.4× 16 0.2× 36 0.5× 42 381
Guillaume Beaudoin-Bussières Canada 13 362 2.0× 35 0.3× 70 0.8× 8 0.1× 20 0.3× 35 551
Owen Lyne United Kingdom 12 73 0.4× 107 1.0× 185 2.0× 15 0.2× 89 1.2× 14 652
Christopher M. Baker Australia 16 36 0.2× 33 0.3× 113 1.2× 19 0.2× 31 0.4× 61 718
Nicky Phillips Denmark 7 128 0.7× 29 0.3× 51 0.5× 10 0.1× 40 0.5× 26 420

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas White. The network helps show where Thomas White may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas White

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas White. Thomas White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bromwich, Talitha, Thomas White, Sophus zu Ermgassen, et al.. (2025). Navigating uncertainty in life cycle assessment‐based approaches to biodiversity footprinting. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 6 indexed citations
2.
Morgan, William H., Thomas White, Katherine A. Sainsbury, et al.. (2025). Exploring gaps, biases, and research priorities in the evidence for reptile conservation actions. Conservation Biology. 39(5). e70073–e70073.
3.
White, Thomas, et al.. (2024). Prioritizing future evidence needs for marine and freshwater mammal conservation action. Animal Conservation. 28(4). 542–552. 1 indexed citations
4.
Steiger, Scott M., Eric C. Bruning, Geoffrey T. Stano, et al.. (2024). Winter Lightning to the Lee of Lake Ontario: The Lake-Effect Electrification (LEE) Field Campaign. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 105(11). E2026–E2046.
6.
White, Thomas, Talitha Bromwich, Leon Bennun, et al.. (2024). The “nature-positive” journey for business: A conceptual research agenda to guide contributions to societal biodiversity goals. One Earth. 7(8). 1373–1386. 13 indexed citations
7.
Pienkowski, Thomas, Arundhati Jagadish, Willow Battista, et al.. (2024). Five lessons for avoiding failure when scaling in conservation. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 8(10). 1804–1814. 6 indexed citations
8.
Iyer, Raja K., William H. Morgan, Nick Salafsky, et al.. (2023). Assessing diverse evidence to improve conservation decision‐making. Conservation Science and Practice. 5(10). 8 indexed citations
9.
Miller, James E., Thomas White, & Raja K. Iyer. (2023). Parachute conservation: Investigating trends in international research. Conservation Letters. 16(3). 19 indexed citations
10.
White, Thomas, Silviu O. Petrovan, Leon Bennun, et al.. (2023). Principles for using evidence to improve biodiversity impact mitigation by business. Business Strategy and the Environment. 32(7). 4719–4733. 13 indexed citations
11.
White, Thomas, Silviu O. Petrovan, Hollie Booth, et al.. (2022). Determining the economic costs and benefits of conservation actions: A decision support framework. Conservation Science and Practice. 4(12). 9 indexed citations
12.
Downey, Harriet, Vincent Bretagnolle, Cameron Brick, et al.. (2022). Principles for the production of evidence‐based guidance for conservation actions. Conservation Science and Practice. 4(5). 12 indexed citations
14.
Kidd, Michael, Alex Richter, Angus Best, et al.. (2021). S-Variant SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B1.1.7 Is Associated With Significantly Higher Viral Load in Samples Tested by TaqPath Polymerase Chain Reaction. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 223(10). 1666–1670. 145 indexed citations
15.
Iyer, Raja K., Thomas White, Philip A. Martin, et al.. (2021). Reducing publication delay to improve the efficiency and impact of conservation science. PeerJ. 9. e12245–e12245. 29 indexed citations
16.
White, Thomas, Joseph W. Bull, Theodore P. Toombs, & Andrew T. Knight. (2021). Uncovering opportunities for effective species conservation banking requires navigating technical and practical complexities. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(7). 10 indexed citations
17.
Richter, Alex, Tim Plant, Michael Kidd, et al.. (2020). How to establish an academic SARS-CoV-2 testing laboratory. Nature Microbiology. 5(12). 1452–1454. 10 indexed citations
18.
Jacob, Céline, et al.. (2020). Marine biodiversity offsets: Pragmatic approaches toward better conservation outcomes. Conservation Letters. 13(3). 25 indexed citations
19.
White, Thomas, Michael N. Johnstone, & Matthew Peacock. (2017). An investigation into some security issues in the DDS messaging protocol. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 10 indexed citations
20.
Reid, Richard, Mitchell Greenberg, Attila T. Lörincz, et al.. (1991). Should cervical cytologic testing be augmented by cervicography or human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid detection?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 164(6). 1461–1471. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026