Thomas W. Eubank

719 total citations
20 papers, 596 citations indexed

About

Thomas W. Eubank is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pollution and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas W. Eubank has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 596 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Plant Science, 13 papers in Pollution and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Thomas W. Eubank's work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (19 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (13 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers). Thomas W. Eubank is often cited by papers focused on Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (19 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (13 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers). Thomas W. Eubank collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Thomas W. Eubank's co-authors include Vijay K. Nandula, Daniel H. Poston, Clifford H. Koger, Krishna N. Reddy, Jason A. Bond, Jason K. Norsworthy, Robert C. Scott, Dilpreet S. Riar, Lawrence E. Steckel and Daniel O. Stephenson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Agronomy Journal and Pest Management Science.

In The Last Decade

Thomas W. Eubank

19 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas W. Eubank United States 12 559 291 132 83 40 20 596
Caio A. C. G. Brunharo United States 14 410 0.7× 185 0.6× 134 1.0× 52 0.6× 27 0.7× 36 453
Scott W. Shirriff Canada 11 369 0.7× 165 0.6× 70 0.5× 67 0.8× 61 1.5× 20 399
Daniel H. Poston United States 15 925 1.7× 487 1.7× 239 1.8× 73 0.9× 76 1.9× 27 966
Mark L. Bernards United States 14 614 1.1× 256 0.9× 110 0.8× 200 2.4× 30 0.8× 37 726
Mark B. Lawton Canada 12 437 0.8× 272 0.9× 136 1.0× 27 0.3× 19 0.5× 22 466
J. M. Urbano Spain 10 300 0.5× 137 0.5× 92 0.7× 52 0.6× 23 0.6× 14 322
Patrick W. Geier United States 14 474 0.8× 222 0.8× 42 0.3× 137 1.7× 41 1.0× 39 522
K. Adamczewski Poland 11 408 0.7× 100 0.3× 59 0.4× 131 1.6× 53 1.3× 89 482
Javid Gherekhloo Iran 15 571 1.0× 197 0.7× 148 1.1× 127 1.5× 63 1.6× 64 631
Michael B. Ashworth Australia 10 346 0.6× 141 0.5× 65 0.5× 71 0.9× 37 0.9× 22 398

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Eubank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Eubank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Eubank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Eubank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Eubank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Eubank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Eubank. The network helps show where Thomas W. Eubank may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Eubank

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Eubank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Eubank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Eubank. Thomas W. Eubank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Vieira, Bruno C., Daniel B. Reynolds, Greg R. Kruger, et al.. (2022). Soybean dose–response to 2,4‐D and dicamba at vegetative and reproductive growth stages. Pest Management Science. 78(7). 2759–2766. 5 indexed citations
3.
Reynolds, Daniel B., et al.. (2019). Effect of soybean growth stage on sensitivity to sublethal rates of dicamba and 2,4-D. Weed Technology. 33(4). 555–561. 18 indexed citations
4.
Bond, Jason A., et al.. (2018). Evaluation of 2,4-D–based Herbicide Mixtures for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Technology. 33(2). 263–271. 4 indexed citations
5.
Bond, Jason A., et al.. (2018). Effect of Fall-Applied Residual Herbicides on Rice Growth and Yield. Weed Technology. 32(5). 526–531. 12 indexed citations
6.
Strickland, Bronson K., et al.. (2017). Estimation of deer damage to soybean production in eastern Mississippi: Perception versus reality. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 41(1). 80–87. 11 indexed citations
7.
Nandula, Vijay K., Parsa Tehranchian, Jason A. Bond, Jason K. Norsworthy, & Thomas W. Eubank. (2017). Glyphosate resistance in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifoliaL.) from Mississippi, USA. Weed Biology and Management. 17(1). 45–53. 4 indexed citations
8.
Orlowski, John M., et al.. (2016). Growth Regulation with Lactofen Does Not Affect Seed Yield of Irrigated Soybean. Agronomy Journal. 108(3). 1112–1115. 7 indexed citations
9.
Bond, Jason A., et al.. (2015). Utilization of Saflufenacil in a Clearfield® Rice (Oryza sativa) System. Weed Technology. 29(2). 255–262. 4 indexed citations
10.
11.
Bond, Jason A., et al.. (2014). Response of Commercial Rice Cultivars to Postemergence Applications of Saflufenacil. Weed Technology. 28(4). 679–684. 8 indexed citations
12.
Bond, Jason A., et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Saflufenacil in Drill-Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technology. 28(4). 660–670. 2 indexed citations
13.
Bond, Jason A., et al.. (2014). Glyphosate-Resistant Italian Ryegrass (Lolium perennessp.multiflorum) Control with Fall-Applied Residual Herbicides. Weed Technology. 28(2). 361–370. 28 indexed citations
14.
Riar, Dilpreet S., Jason K. Norsworthy, Lawrence E. Steckel, et al.. (2013). Adoption of Best Management Practices for Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in Midsouthern United States Cotton, Rice, and Soybean. Weed Technology. 27(4). 788–797. 58 indexed citations
15.
Riar, Dilpreet S., Jason K. Norsworthy, Lawrence E. Steckel, et al.. (2013). Assessment of Weed Management Practices and Problem Weeds in the Midsouth United States—Soybean: A Consultant's Perspective. Weed Technology. 27(3). 612–622. 67 indexed citations
16.
Eubank, Thomas W., Vijay K. Nandula, Krishna N. Reddy, Daniel H. Poston, & David R. Shaw. (2013). Saflufenacil efficacy on horseweed and its interaction with glyphosate. Weed Biology and Management. 13(4). 135–143. 21 indexed citations
17.
Eubank, Thomas W., Vijay K. Nandula, Daniel Poston, & David Shaw. (2012). Multiple Resistance of Horseweed to Glyphosate and Paraquat and Its Control with Paraquat and Metribuzin Combinations. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(4). 358–370. 15 indexed citations
18.
Eubank, Thomas W., Daniel H. Poston, Vijay K. Nandula, et al.. (2008). Glyphosate-resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control Using Glyphosate-, Paraquat-, and Glufosinate-Based Herbicide Programs. Weed Technology. 22(1). 16–21. 74 indexed citations
19.
Nandula, Vijay K., Daniel H. Poston, Thomas W. Eubank, Clifford H. Koger, & Krishna N. Reddy. (2007). Differential Response to Glyphosate in Italian Ryegrass (Lolium Multiflorum) Populations from Mississippi. Weed Technology. 21(2). 477–482. 28 indexed citations
20.
Nandula, Vijay K., Thomas W. Eubank, Daniel H. Poston, Clifford H. Koger, & Krishna N. Reddy. (2006). Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Science. 54(5). 898–902. 139 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026