Thomas W. Bates
- Accounting top 0.2%
- Finance top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Kathleen M. KahleRené M. StulzMichael L. LemmonMark C. ThurmondTim E. CarpenterDavid BecherRonald C. AndersonJohn M. Bizjak
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (22 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwanAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas W. Bates
35 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Accounting 3.1k
- Finance 1.3k
- Strategy and Management 1.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.0k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 351
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Bates
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Bates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Bates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Bates. The network helps show where Thomas W. Bates may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Bates
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Bates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Bates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Bates. Thomas W. Bates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 116 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | Essentials of corporate finance | 12 |
| 8 | Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash than They Used To?breakdown → | 1969 |
| 9 | SHAREHOLDER WELFARE IN MINORITY FREEZE-OUT BIDS :A RE LEGAL PROTECTIONS SUFFICIENT? EVIDENCE FROM THE U.S. MARKET | 1 |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 94 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 110 | |
| 16 | 75 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 85 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Thomas W. Bates
Thomas W. Bates is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 37 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (22 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (3.1k citations), Finance (1.3k citations) and Strategy and Management (1.1k citations). Thomas W. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M. Kahle, René M. Stulz, Michael L. Lemmon, Mark C. Thurmond, Tim E. Carpenter, David Becher, Ronald C. Anderson, John M. Bizjak, James S. Linck and Dominic Slade. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Management Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.