Thomas van Dijk

765 total citations
26 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Thomas van Dijk is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Biophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas van Dijk has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 7 papers in Biophysics. Recurrent topics in Thomas van Dijk's work include Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (7 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (6 papers) and Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (5 papers). Thomas van Dijk is often cited by papers focused on Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (7 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (6 papers) and Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (5 papers). Thomas van Dijk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Thomas van Dijk's co-authors include Taco D. Visser, Rohit Bhargava, David G. Fischer, Emil Wolf, David Mayerich, Matthew V. Schulmerich, P. Scott Carney, P. Scott Carney, Hugo F. Schouten and Brent M. DeVetter and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, ACS Nano and Journal of Power Sources.

In The Last Decade

Thomas van Dijk

24 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas van Dijk Netherlands 14 268 243 136 108 79 26 592
Wenyuan Zhou China 17 520 1.9× 293 1.2× 107 0.8× 57 0.5× 315 4.0× 51 834
Brett H. Hokr United States 17 270 1.0× 263 1.1× 47 0.3× 213 2.0× 127 1.6× 41 702
P. Scott Carney United States 13 353 1.3× 183 0.8× 76 0.6× 378 3.5× 106 1.3× 48 735
Kazuki Hashimoto Japan 11 128 0.5× 154 0.6× 32 0.2× 208 1.9× 156 2.0× 28 491
Ines Latka Germany 20 327 1.2× 169 0.7× 61 0.4× 412 3.8× 444 5.6× 56 1.0k
Ali Basiri United States 11 283 1.1× 250 1.0× 336 2.5× 31 0.3× 172 2.2× 19 672
Sébastien Vergnole Canada 10 186 0.7× 113 0.5× 33 0.2× 115 1.1× 125 1.6× 36 406
Pavel Horváth Czechia 13 89 0.3× 61 0.3× 31 0.2× 32 0.3× 140 1.8× 73 560
Michaël Atlan France 16 406 1.5× 420 1.7× 29 0.2× 106 1.0× 43 0.5× 46 741
William P. Acker United States 12 108 0.4× 168 0.7× 37 0.3× 50 0.5× 138 1.7× 22 445

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas van Dijk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas van Dijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas van Dijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas van Dijk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas van Dijk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas van Dijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas van Dijk. The network helps show where Thomas van Dijk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas van Dijk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas van Dijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas van Dijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas van Dijk. Thomas van Dijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shitut, Shraddha, Thomas van Dijk, Dennis Claessen, & Daniel E. Rozen. (2025). Bacterial heterozygosity promotes survival under multidrug selection. Current Biology. 35(7). 1437–1445.e3.
2.
Dijk, Thomas van, et al.. (2022). In vivo Raman spectroscopy for bladder cancer detection using a superficial Raman probe compared to a nonsuperficial Raman probe. Journal of Biophotonics. 15(6). e202100354–e202100354. 11 indexed citations
3.
Harks, Peter Paul R. M. L., Carla B. Robledo, Chandramohan George, et al.. (2019). Immersion precipitation route towards high performance thick and flexible electrodes for Li-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources. 441. 227200–227200. 14 indexed citations
4.
Dijk, Thomas van, Sungmin Hwang, Joachim Krug, J. Arjan G. M. de Visser, & Mark P. Zwart. (2017). Mutation supply and the repeatability of selection for antibiotic resistance. Physical Biology. 14(5). 55005–55005. 12 indexed citations
5.
Dijk, Thomas van, et al.. (2017). BIM-Sim: Interactive Simulation of Broadband Imaging Using Mie Theory. Frontiers in Physics. 5. 13 indexed citations
6.
Dijk, Thomas van, et al.. (2017). The influence of adipose tissue on spatially resolved near-infrared spectroscopy derived skeletal muscle oxygenation: the extent of the problem. Physiological Measurement. 38(3). 539–554. 45 indexed citations
7.
Dijk, Thomas van, et al.. (2017). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Exploring Old Maps. 1 indexed citations
8.
Mayerich, David, Thomas van Dijk, Michael J. Walsh, et al.. (2014). On the importance of image formation optics in the design of infrared spectroscopic imaging systems. The Analyst. 139(16). 4031–4036. 21 indexed citations
9.
Dijk, Thomas van, David Mayerich, Rohit Bhargava, & P. Scott Carney. (2013). Rapid spectral-domain localization. Optics Express. 21(10). 12822–12822. 8 indexed citations
10.
Dijk, Thomas van, David Mayerich, P. Scott Carney, & Rohit Bhargava. (2013). Recovery of Absorption Spectra from Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Microspectroscopic Measurements of Intact Spheres. Applied Spectroscopy. 67(5). 546–552. 43 indexed citations
11.
Dijk, Thomas van, et al.. (2013). Accentuating focus maps via partial schematization. TU/e Research Portal. 428–431. 10 indexed citations
12.
Fischer, David G., Thomas van Dijk, Taco D. Visser, & Emil Wolf. (2011). Coherence effects in Mie scattering. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 29(1). 78–78. 22 indexed citations
13.
Dijk, Thomas van, Hugo F. Schouten, & Taco D. Visser. (2010). Geometric interpretation of the Pancharatnam connection and non-cyclic polarization changes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 27(9). 1972–1972. 19 indexed citations
14.
Dijk, Thomas van, David G. Fischer, Taco D. Visser, & Emil Wolf. (2010). Effects of Spatial Coherence on the Angular Distribution of Radiant Intensity Generated by Scattering on a Sphere. Physical Review Letters. 104(17). 173902–173902. 95 indexed citations
16.
Visser, Taco D., Thomas van Dijk, Hugo F. Schouten, & W. Ubachs. (2010). The Pancharatnam-Berry phase for non-cyclic polarization changes. Optics Express. 18(10). 10796–10796. 32 indexed citations
17.
Dijk, Thomas van, David G. Fischer, Taco D. Visser, & Emil Wolf. (2010). The Effects of Spatial Coherence on the Angular Distribution of Radiant Intensity Generated by Scattering on a Sphere. FThN1–FThN1. 5 indexed citations
18.
Dijk, Thomas van & Taco D. Visser. (2009). Evolution of singularities in a partially coherent vortex beam. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 26(4). 741–741. 33 indexed citations
19.
Dijk, Thomas van, et al.. (2009). Evolution of Singularities in a Partially Coherent Vortex Beam. FWU2–FWU2.
20.
Dijk, Thomas van, Greg Gbur, & Taco D. Visser. (2008). Shaping the focal intensity distribution using spatial coherence. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 25(3). 575–575. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026