Thomas Underwood
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Molecular Biology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Apostolos PilaftsisRoman ZwickyFrank KraussStefan HöcheJoachim KoppTerrance FigyAthanasios DedesM. Lindner
- Topics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers)Neutrino Physics Research (3 papers)Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers)
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics BJournal of High Energy PhysicsPhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyGreece
In The Last Decade
Thomas Underwood
6 papers receiving 934 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 907
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 342
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 37
- Molecular Biology 32
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 24
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Underwood
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Underwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Underwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Underwood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Underwood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Underwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Underwood. The network helps show where Thomas Underwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Underwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Underwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Underwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Underwood. Thomas Underwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 273 | |
| 7 | Resonant leptogenesisbreakdown → | 585 |
About Thomas Underwood
Thomas Underwood is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Finance, having authored 7 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (6 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (3 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (907 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (342 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (37 citations). Thomas Underwood has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Apostolos Pilaftsis, Roman Zwicky, Frank Krauss, Stefan Höche, Joachim Kopp, Terrance Figy, Athanasios Dedes, M. Lindner, Viviana Niro and Katherine Espinosa. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Journal of High Energy Physics and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.