Thomas Stöhr

68 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Thomas Stöhr's Hit Papers

Animal models in translational medicine: Validation and prediction 2014 · 324 citations
3240+4+8Years since publication100200300

Peers

Thomas Stöhr
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 434
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 305
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 828
  • Developmental Neuroscience 165
Replace Jun‐Ming Zhang with:
Jun‐Ming Zhang United States
Wen Wang China
Lei Yu United States
Adam R. Ferguson United States
Sang Soo Kang South Korea
He Liu China
Michael J. M. Fischer Germany
Reinhard Bauer Germany
Qing Tian China
Lan Ma China
Thomas Stöhr relative to Jun‐Ming Zhang United States Jun‐Ming Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jun‐Ming Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Stöhr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Stöhr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Stöhr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Stöhr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Stöhr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Stöhr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Stöhr. The network helps show where Thomas Stöhr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Stöhr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Stöhr Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Stöhr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007356
2
Animal models in translational medicine: Validation and prediction
Hit paper breakdown →
2014324
3 2007288
4 2008214
5 2015207
6 2000187
7 2007138
8 2021123
9 2006110
10 2012106
11 200694
12 200086
13 199881
14 199876
15 199572
16 201868
17 200767
18 200565
19 199465
20 199953

About Thomas Stöhr

Thomas Stöhr is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Physiology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (10 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (10 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (8 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (6 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (434 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (305 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (828 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (165 citations). Thomas Stöhr has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adam C. Errington, George Lees, Cara Heers, B. Beyreuther, Joram Feldon, Maarten Van Roy, Tinneke Denayer, Julia Lehmann, Noëlle Callizot and Joachim Freitag. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Neuropharmacology, Epilepsy Research and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact