Thomas Steck

978 citations
26 papers · 682 indexed · h-index 15

Thomas Steck

25 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

Thomas Steck
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Reproductive Medicine 240
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 155
  • Immunology 233
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 149
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 234
Replace Katharina Walch with:
Katharina Walch Austria
S. Bussen Germany
K. W. Hancock United Kingdom
Fausta Beneventi Italy
Joan Rasor United States
Raymond W. Ke United States
Michael Feinman United States
Saffet Dılek Türkiye
I. Phocas Greece
Menachem Granat Israel
Thomas Steck relative to Katharina Walch Austria Katharina Walch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Katharina Walch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Steck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Steck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Steck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Steck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Steck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Steck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Steck. The network helps show where Thomas Steck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Steck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Steck Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Steck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200714
2 200714
3 200547
4 200413
5 20040
6 200378
7 200333
8 200328
9 200156
10 200083
11
Evaluation of a cut-off value for sperm motility after different hours of incubation to select the suitable reproductive technology (IVF or ICSI).
199911
12 19994
13 199818
14 199891
15 199715
16 199749
17 199516
18 19953
19 199345
20 199213

About Thomas Steck

Thomas Steck is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (240 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (155 citations) and Immunology (233 citations). Thomas Steck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include J. Dietl, S. Bussen, Martin K. Oehler, J. Martius, Marc Sütterlin, Carole Ober, Bruno Allolio, Martin Faßnacht, Wiebke Arlt and Ralf Giess. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Journal of Reproductive Immunology, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026