Thomas Specht

652 total citations
8 papers, 539 citations indexed

About

Thomas Specht is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Specht has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 539 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 2 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Thomas Specht's work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). Thomas Specht is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). Thomas Specht collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Poland. Thomas Specht's co-authors include Christian Pilarsky, H. D. Saeger, Robert Grützmann, Ivo Zadra, Hubert Kürnsteiner, Mathias Ziegler, Monica Hirsch‐Kauffmann, Marc Niere, Christoph Weise and Felicitas Lerner and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, FEBS Letters and Plant Science.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Specht

8 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Specht Germany	7	400	124	73	72	68	8	539
Nancy E. Go Canada	15	591 1.5×	49 0.4×	26 0.4×	12 0.2×	30 0.4×	20	737
Géraldine Mitou France	9	325 0.8×	27 0.2×	113 1.5×	13 0.2×	28 0.4×	10	580
Vijaya Charaka United States	10	464 1.2×	71 0.6×	35 0.5×	12 0.2×	16 0.2×	12	578
Karin Hochegger Austria	5	452 1.1×	111 0.9×	35 0.5×	10 0.1×	22 0.3×	5	634
Young Ho Moon South Korea	8	143 0.4×	40 0.3×	76 1.0×	60 0.8×	27 0.4×	12	346
Konstantin Akopiants United States	11	513 1.3×	95 0.8×	19 0.3×	13 0.2×	51 0.8×	15	586
Nadja Sandra Katheder Norway	7	399 1.0×	76 0.6×	16 0.2×	17 0.2×	21 0.3×	8	618
Vinay V. Eapen United States	14	646 1.6×	98 0.8×	77 1.1×	11 0.2×	21 0.3×	17	808
Anita Baillet France	12	394 1.0×	65 0.5×	26 0.4×	24 0.3×	24 0.4×	15	554
Fergal O’Farrell Sweden	7	337 0.8×	49 0.4×	13 0.2×	16 0.2×	23 0.3×	12	554

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Specht

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Specht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Specht

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Specht. The network helps show where Thomas Specht may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Specht

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Specht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Specht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Specht. Thomas Specht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Dahlmann, Tim A., et al.. (2014). Genome Sequence and Annotation of Acremonium chrysogenum , Producer of the β-Lactam Antibiotic Cephalosporin C. Genome Announcements. 2(5). 31 indexed citations

2.

Blatzer, Michael, Fabio Gsaller, Beate Abt, et al.. (2013). An endogenous promoter for conditional gene expression in Acremonium chrysogenum: The xylan and xylose inducible promoter xyl1P. Journal of Biotechnology. 169. 82–86. 13 indexed citations

3.

Haas, Hubertus, et al.. (2010). Among Developmental Regulators, StuA but Not BrlA Is Essential for Penicillin V Production in Penicillium chrysogenum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 77(3). 972–982. 45 indexed citations

4.

Harris, Steven D., Geoffrey Turner, Vera Meyer, et al.. (2009). Morphology and development in Aspergillus nidulans: A complex puzzle. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 46(1). S82–S92. 43 indexed citations

5.

Pilarsky, Christian, et al.. (2004). Identification and Validation of Commonly Overexpressed Genes in Solid Tumors by Comparison of Microarray Data. Neoplasia. 6(6). 744–750. 281 indexed citations

6.

Schweiger, Manfred, K. Hennig, Felicitas Lerner, et al.. (2001). Characterization of recombinant human nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyl transferase (NMNAT), a nuclear enzyme essential for NAD synthesis. FEBS Letters. 492(1-2). 95–100. 112 indexed citations

7.

Szymański, M., et al.. (1997). Compilation of ribosomal 5S ribonucleic acid nucleotide sequences: eukaryotic 5S rRNAs. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression. 1350(1). 75–79. 6 indexed citations

8.

Barciszewska, Mirosława Z., M. Szymański, Thomas Specht, Volker A. Erdmann, & Jan Barciszewski. (1994). Compilation of plant 5S ribosomal RNA sequences on RNA and DNA levels. Plant Science. 100(2). 117–128. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact