Thomas Smith

55 papers receiving 708 citations

Peers

Thomas Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 322
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 106
  • Geophysics 117
  • Atmospheric Science 128
  • Environmental Chemistry 70
Replace H.J. Hofmann with:
H.J. Hofmann Switzerland
G. Cini Castagnoli Italy
H. B. Franz United States
Nir J. Shaviv Israel
M. Fruneau France
G. Bonino Italy
S. A. Korff United States
K. Rages United States
Yayoi N. Miura Japan
Michael G. Jones United States
Thomas Smith relative to H.J. Hofmann Switzerland H.J. Hofmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
H.J. Hofmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Smith. The network helps show where Thomas Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009138
2 1996103
3 199668
4 201452
5 200242
6 200037
7 201117
8 199216
9 201115
10 201914
11 201814
12 200214
13 199413
14 199513
15 197811
16 202010
17 200610
18 20178
19 20218
20 20247

About Thomas Smith

Thomas Smith is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geophysics, Atmospheric Science and Ecology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (25 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (19 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (9 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (8 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (7 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (7 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (322 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (106 citations), Geophysics (117 citations), Atmospheric Science (128 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (70 citations). Thomas Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Hennings, P. A. Bland, Frank J. Berry, C. T. Pillinger, Stéphane Bujan, Dominique Poirier, Aurélia Mouret, Jonathan Deborde, Pierre Anschutz and Pascal Lécroart. Their work appears in journals such as Meteoritics and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Physics Letters A, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences and Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact