Thomas Scheck
-
- Thermal Regulation in Medicine 9
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 4
- Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 3
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 6
-
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms 5
-
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 3
- Nausea and vomiting management 2
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 2
- Co-authors
- Alexander KoberDaniel I. SesslerKlaus HoeraufOzan AkçaManfred GreherAndrea KurzCem F. ArkiliçV. Goll
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineComplementary and alternative medicineEmergency Medicine
- Journals
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (9 papers)Mayo Clinic Proceedings (3 papers)Anesthesiology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Thomas Scheck
18 papers receiving 753 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 301
- Complementary and alternative medicine 164
- Emergency Medicine 140
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 75
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 99
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Scheck
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Scheck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Scheck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Scheck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Scheck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Scheck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Scheck. The network helps show where Thomas Scheck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Scheck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 92 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 64 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 44 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 66 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 126 | |
| 16 | [Consenting and declining patients for an intervention group after breast cancer surgery differ in terms of quality of life, coping and immunological functional assays]. | 2001 | 3 |
| 17 | 2001 | 49 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 181 |
About Thomas Scheck
Thomas Scheck is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermal Regulation in Medicine (9 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (301 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (164 citations) and Emergency Medicine (140 citations). Thomas Scheck has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Kober, Daniel I. Sessler, Klaus Hoerauf, Ozan Akça, Manfred Greher, Andrea Kurz, Cem F. Arkiliç, V. Goll, Burkhard Gustorff and Béla Fülesdi. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Anesthesiology, Anaesthesia and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.