Thomas Pope

804 citations
23 papers · 664 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Pope

22 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Thomas Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 265
  • Electrochemistry 50
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 447
  • Materials Chemistry 258
  • Biomedical Engineering 165
Replace Songjun Hou with:
Songjun Hou United Kingdom
Arunabh Batra United States
Giacomo Lovat Italy
Oday A. Al‐Owaedi Iraq
Chunhui Gu China
Santiago Marqués‐González United Kingdom
Jan C. Hummelen Netherlands
Jakob Kryger Sørensen Denmark
Markrete Krikorian United States
Thomas Pope relative to Songjun Hou United Kingdom Songjun Hou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.5×
Songjun Hou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pope. The network helps show where Thomas Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Pope Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013287
2 201456
3 201552
4 201445
5 201942
6 201635
7 202025
8 201516
9 201213
10 202212
11 201712
12 201412
13 202111
14 201810
15 20249
16 20237
17 20245
18 20234
19 20244
20 20184

About Thomas Pope

Thomas Pope is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (10 papers), Graphene research and applications (5 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (3 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (2 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (2 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (265 citations), Electrochemistry (50 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (447 citations), Materials Chemistry (258 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (165 citations). Thomas Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include Colin J. Lambert, David Zsolt Manrique, Thomas Wandlowski, Murat Gülçür, Martin R. Bryce, Wenjing Hong, Pavel Moreno‐García, Cancan Huang, Veerabhadrarao Kaliginedi and Andrei S. Batsanov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Chemistry C, Chemical Communications, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Scientific Reports and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact