Thomas Peer

980 total citations
28 papers, 717 citations indexed

About

Thomas Peer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Peer has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 717 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 10 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Thomas Peer's work include Lichen and fungal ecology (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). Thomas Peer is often cited by papers focused on Lichen and fungal ecology (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). Thomas Peer collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Belgium and Germany. Thomas Peer's co-authors include Kris Verheyen, Bart Muys, Quentin Ponette, Martín Grube, Stefanie Maier, Ursula Lütz‐Meindl, Farrukh Hussain, Roman Türk, Elisa Van Cleemput and Vincent Kint and has published in prestigious journals such as Global Change Biology, Journal of Ecology and Journal of Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Peer

27 papers receiving 688 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Peer Austria 16 257 198 168 148 94 28 717
Xinyu Jiang China 12 43 0.2× 95 0.5× 132 0.8× 116 0.8× 60 0.6× 20 545
Ningfei Lei China 17 144 0.6× 159 0.8× 224 1.3× 78 0.5× 128 1.4× 74 798
Seyed Mohsen Hosseini Iran 18 147 0.6× 235 1.2× 266 1.6× 152 1.0× 39 0.4× 47 987
Jinlong Wang China 16 110 0.4× 122 0.6× 199 1.2× 130 0.9× 48 0.5× 73 710
Raúl Ortega Spain 19 191 0.7× 78 0.4× 172 1.0× 206 1.4× 99 1.1× 65 993
Wolf Gruber Belgium 6 157 0.6× 225 1.1× 298 1.8× 60 0.4× 146 1.6× 7 594
M.N. Jiménez Spain 18 70 0.3× 333 1.7× 169 1.0× 212 1.4× 140 1.5× 39 769
R. D’Ascoli Italy 16 93 0.4× 124 0.6× 299 1.8× 220 1.5× 127 1.4× 22 1.0k
John Scullion United Kingdom 17 123 0.5× 104 0.5× 346 2.1× 59 0.4× 113 1.2× 44 773
Federica D. Conti Italy 13 162 0.6× 118 0.6× 134 0.8× 136 0.9× 132 1.4× 15 673

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Peer. The network helps show where Thomas Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Peer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Peer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Peer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Peer. Thomas Peer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Abbas, Zaheer, Shujaul Mulk Khan, Jan Alam, et al.. (2021). Vegetation dynamics along altitudinal gradients in the Shigar valley (Central Karakorum) Pakistan: zonation, physiognomy, ecosystem services and environmental impacts. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 53(5). 6 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Laura, Patrick Jung, Stefanie Maier, et al.. (2017). Assessing recovery of biological soil crusts across a latitudinal gradient in Western Europe. Restoration Ecology. 26(3). 543–554. 19 indexed citations
3.
Peer, Thomas, Simone Mereu, Kris Verheyen, et al.. (2017). Tree seedling vitality improves with functional diversity in a Mediterranean common garden experiment. Forest Ecology and Management. 409. 614–633. 9 indexed citations
4.
Peer, Thomas, Kris Verheyen, Vincent Kint, Elisa Van Cleemput, & Bart Muys. (2016). Plasticity of tree architecture through interspecific and intraspecific competition in a young experimental plantation. Forest Ecology and Management. 385. 1–9. 57 indexed citations
5.
Vanhellemont, Margot, Lander Baeten, Thomas Peer, et al.. (2016). Local neighbourhood effects on sapling growth in a young experimental forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 384. 424–443. 13 indexed citations
6.
Büdel, Burkhard, Claudia Colesie, T. G. Allan Green, et al.. (2014). Improved appreciation of the functioning and importance of biological soil crusts in Europe: the Soil Crust International Project (SCIN). Biodiversity and Conservation. 23(7). 1639–1658. 78 indexed citations
7.
Maier, Stefanie, et al.. (2014). Analyses of dryland biological soil crusts highlight lichens as an important regulator of microbial communities. Biodiversity and Conservation. 23(7). 1735–1755. 65 indexed citations
8.
Rinnerthaler, Mark, Jutta Duschl, Peter Steinbacher, et al.. (2013). Age‐related changes in the composition of the cornified envelope in human skin. Experimental Dermatology. 22(5). 329–335. 64 indexed citations
10.
Peer, Thomas, et al.. (2011). Pb-induced ultrastructural alterations and subcellular localization of Pb in two species of Lespedeza by TEM-coupled electron energy loss spectroscopy. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 77. 196–206. 43 indexed citations
11.
Liu, Xiaoming, et al.. (2011). Effects of Lead and EDTA-Assisted Lead on Biomass, Lead Uptake and Mineral Nutrients in Lespedeza chinensis and Lespedeza davidii. Water Air & Soil Pollution. 220(1-4). 57–68. 22 indexed citations
12.
Peer, Thomas, et al.. (2008). The impact of the tunnel exhausts in terms of heavy metals to the surrounding ecosystem. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 150(1-4). 261–71. 23 indexed citations
13.
Peer, Thomas, et al.. (2008). Rapid Test Methods for the Field Screening of Heavy Metals in Soil Samples. Water Air & Soil Pollution. 199(1-4). 291–300. 5 indexed citations
14.
Sager, Manfred, et al.. (2008). Soil Contamination From Tannery Wastes with Emphasis on the Fate and Distribution of Tri- and Hexavalent Chromium. Water Air & Soil Pollution. 199(1-4). 123–137. 32 indexed citations
15.
Peer, Thomas, et al.. (2007). Phytosociology, structure and diversity of the steppe vegetation in the mountains of Northern Pakistan. Phytocoenologia. 37(1). 1–65. 28 indexed citations
16.
Lettner, H., et al.. (2005). Altitude dependent 137Cs concentrations in different plant species in alpine agricultural areas. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 86(1). 12–30. 14 indexed citations
17.
Peer, Thomas, et al.. (2001). Vegetation and altitudinal zonation in relation to the impact of grazing in the steppe lands of the Hindu Kush Range (N-Pakistan). Phytocoenologia. 31(4). 477–498. 21 indexed citations
18.
Peer, Thomas. (2000). The Highland Steppes of the Hindukush Range as Indicators of Centuries Old Pasture Farming. 312–325. 5 indexed citations
19.
Peer, Thomas. (1997). Biochemie des Bodens. 32 indexed citations
20.
Peer, Thomas, et al.. (1994). Das Verhalten von Radiocäsium in Weiderasen der Hohen Tauern (Salzburg, Austria). 105–111. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026