Thomas Martinetz

8.8k total citations · 4 hit papers
131 papers, 5.5k citations indexed

About

Thomas Martinetz is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Martinetz has authored 131 papers receiving a total of 5.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 37 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Thomas Martinetz's work include Neural Networks and Applications (19 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (17 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (12 papers). Thomas Martinetz is often cited by papers focused on Neural Networks and Applications (19 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (17 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (12 papers). Thomas Martinetz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Egypt. Thomas Martinetz's co-authors include Klaus Schulten, Erhardt Barth, Klaus Schulten, Matthias Mölle, Jan Born, Helge Ritter, Hong‐Viet V. Ngo, Michael Dörr, Hammam Alshazly and Christoph Linse and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Neuron and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Martinetz

125 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Hit Papers

'Neural-gas' network for vector quantization and its appl... 1993 2026 2004 2015 1993 2013 1994 2021 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Martinetz Germany 31 1.9k 1.7k 1.5k 547 493 131 5.5k
Shin Ishii Japan 36 2.1k 1.1× 1.3k 0.8× 1.3k 0.8× 1.2k 2.2× 291 0.6× 234 6.3k
D.H. Ballard United States 23 946 0.5× 3.3k 1.9× 2.9k 1.9× 974 1.8× 225 0.5× 64 9.1k
David G. Stork United States 26 2.4k 1.3× 2.4k 1.4× 832 0.6× 344 0.6× 1.1k 2.2× 176 6.6k
T.M. McGinnity United Kingdom 37 1.6k 0.9× 566 0.3× 1.9k 1.2× 259 0.5× 405 0.8× 308 5.5k
Fuhui Long United States 20 3.0k 1.6× 2.4k 1.4× 789 0.5× 2.4k 4.3× 652 1.3× 31 9.5k
Alain Rakotomamonjy France 25 1.2k 0.6× 1.2k 0.7× 1.8k 1.2× 170 0.3× 758 1.5× 63 4.5k
Vittorio Murino Italy 44 1.8k 1.0× 5.2k 3.1× 547 0.4× 431 0.8× 959 1.9× 380 8.6k
Helge Ritter Germany 41 2.1k 1.1× 2.0k 1.2× 2.5k 1.7× 246 0.4× 482 1.0× 356 6.9k
Robert A. Jacobs United States 38 4.9k 2.6× 1.8k 1.1× 2.8k 1.9× 820 1.5× 1.0k 2.1× 120 11.1k
Dimitris Samaras United States 40 878 0.5× 3.3k 1.9× 816 0.5× 215 0.4× 222 0.5× 149 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Martinetz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Martinetz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Martinetz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Martinetz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Martinetz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Martinetz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Martinetz. The network helps show where Thomas Martinetz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Martinetz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Martinetz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Martinetz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Martinetz. Thomas Martinetz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grisanti, Salvatore, et al.. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) Data Analysis—Toward Retinal Metabolic Diagnostics. Diagnostics. 14(4). 431–431. 2 indexed citations
3.
Linse, Christoph, Erhardt Barth, & Thomas Martinetz. (2023). Convolutional Neural Networks Do Work with Pre-Defined Filters. arXiv (Cornell University). 1341. 1–8. 1 indexed citations
4.
Linse, Christoph & Thomas Martinetz. (2023). Large Neural Networks Learning from Scratch with Very Few Data and without Explicit Regularization. 279–283. 3 indexed citations
5.
Sharma, Sahil, et al.. (2022). Trading Stocks Based on Financial News Using Attention Mechanism. Mathematics. 10(12). 2001–2001. 9 indexed citations
6.
Petersen, Eike, et al.. (2022). Closed‐loop acoustic stimulation during an afternoon nap to modulate subsequent encoding. Journal of Sleep Research. 31(6). e13734–e13734. 8 indexed citations
7.
Haq, Rizwan ul, Muhammad Waqas Anwar, Lisa Marshall, et al.. (2021). A computational study of suppression of sharp wave ripple complexes by controlling calcium and gap junctions in pyramidal cells. Bioengineered. 12(1). 2603–2615. 1 indexed citations
8.
Sieren, Malte Maria, et al.. (2021). An AI-based Framework for Diagnostic Quality Assessment of Ankle Radiographs. 484–496. 5 indexed citations
9.
Hammer, Barbara, Haibo He, & Thomas Martinetz. (2014). Learning and modeling big data. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 4 indexed citations
10.
Kandaswamy, Krishna Kumar, Ganesan Pugalenthi, Kai‐Uwe Kalies, Enno Hartmann, & Thomas Martinetz. (2012). EcmPred: Prediction of extracellular matrix proteins based on random forest with maximum relevance minimum redundancy feature selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 317. 377–383. 22 indexed citations
11.
Krause, Christopher, et al.. (2012). Automated Indirect Immunofluorescence Evaluation of Antinuclear Autoantibodies on HEp-2 Cells. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2012. 1–7. 51 indexed citations
12.
Zhang, Jiajie, Amir Madany Mamlouk, Thomas Martinetz, et al.. (2011). PhyloMap: an algorithm for visualizing relationships of large sequence data sets and its application to the influenza A virus genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 12(1). 248–248. 20 indexed citations
13.
Martinetz, Thomas, et al.. (2010). Learning sparse codes for image reconstruction.. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. 3 indexed citations
14.
Barth, Erhardt, et al.. (2008). Learning Data Representations with Sparse Coding Neural Gas. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. 233–238. 8 indexed citations
15.
Udluft, Steffen, et al.. (2007). Neural Rewards Regression for Near-optimal Policy Identification in Markovian and Partial Observable Environments. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. 301–306. 6 indexed citations
16.
Schäfer, Anton Maximilian, et al.. (2007). The Intrinsic Recurrent Support Vector Machine. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. 325–330. 4 indexed citations
17.
Dörr, Michael, et al.. (2005). Eye movements on a display with gaze-contingent temporal resolution. Perception. 34. 0–0. 2 indexed citations
18.
Dörr, Michael, Martin Böhme, Thomas Martinetz, & Erhardt Barth. (2005). Predicting, analysing, and guiding eye movements. Neural Information Processing Systems.
19.
Böhme, Martin, et al.. (2004). Saliency Extraction for Gaze-Contingent Displays. GI Jahrestagung (2). 646–650. 1 indexed citations
20.
Wilke, Claus O., et al.. (1999). Dynamic fitness landscapes in the quasispecies model. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026