Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lukasiewicz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lukasiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lukasiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lukasiewicz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lukasiewicz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lukasiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lukasiewicz. The network helps show where Thomas Lukasiewicz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Lukasiewicz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Lukasiewicz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Lukasiewicz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Lukasiewicz. Thomas Lukasiewicz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lukasiewicz, Thomas, María Vanina Martínez, Andréas Pieris, & Gerardo I. Simari. (2015). From Classical to Consistent Query Answering under Existential Rules.. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).9 indexed citations
9.
Gottlob, Georg, et al.. (2014). Stable model semantics for guarded existential rules and description logics. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 258–267.14 indexed citations
10.
d’Amato, Claudia, Nicola Fanizzi, Floriana Esposito, & Thomas Lukasiewicz. (2013). Representing Uncertain Concepts in Rough Description Logics via Contextual Indiscernibility Relations. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).2 indexed citations
Calı̀, Andrea, Georg Gottlob, & Thomas Lukasiewicz. (2009). Tractable query answering over ontologies with datalog. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 477.8 indexed citations
13.
Lukasiewicz, Thomas & Azzurra Ragone. (2009). A Combination of Boolean Games with Description Logics for Automated Multi−Attribute Negotiation. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 477.1 indexed citations
Calı̀, Andrea, et al.. (2007). A framework for representing ontology mappings under probabilities and inconsistency. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London). 327. 13–24.6 indexed citations
16.
Lukasiewicz, Thomas, et al.. (2006). Variable-strength conditional preferences for matchmaking in description logics. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 164–174.5 indexed citations
17.
Finzi, Alberto & Thomas Lukasiewicz. (2004). Game-theoretic agent programming in Golog. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 18–22.7 indexed citations
18.
Lukasiewicz, Thomas, et al.. (2002). CAUSES AND EXPLANATIONS IN THE STRUCTURAL-MODEL APPROACH: TRACTABLE CASES.12 indexed citations
19.
Lukasiewicz, Thomas. (1998). Probabilistic Logic Programming. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 388–392.48 indexed citations
20.
Lukasiewicz, Thomas. (1996). Precision of probabilistic deduction under taxonomic knowledge. AI Communications. 9(4). 227–228.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.