Thomas Loop
Impact in
- Aging top 10%
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Papers in
-
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 5
- RNA Research and Splicing 3
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 2
- Congenital heart defects research 1
- Cancer-related gene regulation 1
- Genetics 4
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities 4
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 1
- Co-authors
- Heinrich Reichert (7 shared papers)Frank Hirth (5 shared papers)Katsuo Furukubo-Tokunaga (1 shared paper)Walter J. Gehring (1 shared paper)Stavros Therianos (1 shared paper)Boris Egger (5 shared papers)Ronny Leemans (5 shared papers)Ulrich Certa (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Genome biology (2 papers)Development (2 papers)BMC Genomics (1 paper)Neuron (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Loop
7 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Aging 23
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 169
- Molecular Biology 334
- Developmental Neuroscience 18
- Genetics 108
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Loop
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Loop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Loop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Loop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Loop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Loop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Loop. The network helps show where Thomas Loop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Loop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 170 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 22 |
About Thomas Loop
Thomas Loop is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology and Cancer Research, having authored 7 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (5 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (4 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Congenital heart defects research (1 paper), Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (23 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (169 citations), Molecular Biology (334 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (18 citations) and Genetics (108 citations). Thomas Loop has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Heinrich Reichert, Frank Hirth, Katsuo Furukubo-Tokunaga, Walter J. Gehring, Stavros Therianos, Boris Egger, Ronny Leemans, Ulrich Certa, Lars Kammermeier and Beate Hartmann. Their work appears in journals such as Genome biology, Development, BMC Genomics, Neuron and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.