Thomas Lodato

962 total citations
14 papers, 626 citations indexed

About

Thomas Lodato is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Lodato has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 626 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Thomas Lodato's work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers) and Smart Cities and Technologies (4 papers). Thomas Lodato is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers) and Smart Cities and Technologies (4 papers). Thomas Lodato collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas Lodato's co-authors include Carl DiSalvo, Taylor Shelton, Tom Jenkins, Jonathan Lukens, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Mariam Asad, Melissa Gregg, T.P. Barnwell, Phoebe Sengers and Jennifer Clark and has published in prestigious journals such as New Media & Society, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies and interactions.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Lodato

14 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Lodato United States 12 285 198 187 167 85 14 626
Mariam Asad United States 11 341 1.2× 132 0.7× 63 0.3× 217 1.3× 105 1.2× 17 669
Clara Crivellaro United Kingdom 16 506 1.8× 216 1.1× 71 0.4× 289 1.7× 97 1.1× 40 835
Joanna Saad-Sulonen Denmark 14 248 0.9× 210 1.1× 97 0.5× 158 0.9× 59 0.7× 47 556
Mara Balestrini United Kingdom 12 162 0.6× 100 0.5× 64 0.3× 86 0.5× 69 0.8× 22 402
Erling Björgvinsson Sweden 6 425 1.5× 320 1.6× 58 0.3× 258 1.5× 75 0.9× 11 772
Nicolai Brodersen Hansen Denmark 12 345 1.2× 204 1.0× 37 0.2× 147 0.9× 46 0.5× 41 648
Vasilis Vlachokyriakos United Kingdom 12 262 0.9× 92 0.5× 34 0.2× 120 0.7× 55 0.6× 37 452
Vasillis Vlachokyriakos United Kingdom 8 295 1.0× 118 0.6× 42 0.2× 132 0.8× 63 0.7× 9 471
Sara Heitlinger United Kingdom 13 377 1.3× 183 0.9× 73 0.4× 97 0.6× 28 0.3× 20 567
Mark Bilandzic Australia 11 133 0.5× 57 0.3× 34 0.2× 124 0.7× 47 0.6× 24 617

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lodato

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lodato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lodato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lodato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lodato

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lodato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lodato. The network helps show where Thomas Lodato may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Lodato

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Lodato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Lodato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Lodato. Thomas Lodato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Loi, Daria & Thomas Lodato. (2020). On empathy and empiricism. interactions. 28(1). 23–25. 1 indexed citations
2.
Shelton, Taylor & Thomas Lodato. (2019). Actually existing smart citizens. City. 23(1). 35–52. 126 indexed citations
3.
Lodato, Thomas, et al.. (2018). Open government data in the smart city: Interoperability, urban knowledge, and linking legacy systems. Journal of Urban Affairs. 43(4). 586–600. 20 indexed citations
4.
Lodato, Thomas & Carl DiSalvo. (2018). Institutional constraints. 1–12. 57 indexed citations
5.
Loi, Daria, et al.. (2018). PD manifesto for AI futures. 1–4. 18 indexed citations
6.
Shelton, Taylor & Thomas Lodato. (2018). Actually existing smart citizens: expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city. City. 23(1). 35–52. 27 indexed citations
7.
Lodato, Thomas & Carl DiSalvo. (2016). Issue-oriented hackathons as material participation. New Media & Society. 18(4). 539–557. 70 indexed citations
8.
DiSalvo, Carl, Tom Jenkins, & Thomas Lodato. (2016). Designing Speculative Civics. 4979–4990. 52 indexed citations
9.
Jenkins, Tom, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Carl DiSalvo, Thomas Lodato, & Mariam Asad. (2016). Object-Oriented Publics. 827–839. 43 indexed citations
10.
DiSalvo, Carl, et al.. (2014). Making public things. 2397–2406. 123 indexed citations
11.
DiSalvo, Carl, Melissa Gregg, & Thomas Lodato. (2014). Building belonging. interactions. 21(4). 58–61. 23 indexed citations
12.
Lodato, Thomas & Daria Loi. (2014). Where's love in e-waste?. 195–197. 4 indexed citations
13.
DiSalvo, Carl, et al.. (2014). Constructing and constraining participation in participatory arts and HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 74. 107–123. 28 indexed citations
14.
DiSalvo, Carl, et al.. (2011). The collective articulation of issues as design practice. CoDesign. 7(3-4). 185–197. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026